ArticleJournal of neurosurgery. Case lessons2026
Intraventricular giant cavernous malformation mimicking central neurocytoma characterized by digital subtraction angiography: illustrative case.
Article in Journal of neurosurgery. Case lessons, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundCavernous malformations (CMs) are low-flow vascular lesions that are typically angiographically occult due to slow blood transit through dysplastic vascular channels. Diagnosis is established using MRI, which characteristically demonstrates a heterogeneous popcorn-like lesion with a hemosiderin rim. Rare reports, however, have described subtle angiographic abnormalities. Intraventricular CMs are particularly uncommon, and their angiographic features remain poorly characterized. OBSERVATIONS: The authors report the case of a 30-year-old man presenting with seizures and a large heterogeneous intraventricular mass initially interpreted as a central neurocytoma. Digital subtraction angiography demonstrated lenticulostriate arterial feeders forming a fine vascular meshwork with punctate venous stasis. The patient underwent left frontal craniotomy for gross-total resection under neuronavigation, and intraoperative and histopathological findings confirmed a CM. A focused literature review identified prior reports of angiographically detectable CMs demonstrating tumor stain, venous pooling, or capillary blush. LESSONS: Although CMs are classically angiographically occult, subtle angiographic findings may occasionally be detected, particularly in large or atypically located lesions. Recognition of these findings may aid differentiation from other vascular or intraventricular neoplastic lesions and assist preoperative planning. This case expands the limited literature on angiographically detectable intraventricular CMs and highlights a complementary role for angiography in selected cases. https://thejns.org/doi/10.3171/CASE26530.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.