ReviewThe Journal of endocrinology2026
Defining the potential role of the mineralocorticoid receptor in musculoskeletal health and bone crosstalk with other tissues.
Review in The Journal of endocrinology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Excessive mineralocorticoid receptor (MR) activation in the heart and vasculature leads to pathological effects such as extracellular matrix accumulation, oxidative stress, and sustained inflammation. While MR's role in cardiovascular and renal systems is well understood, MR signaling has also been implicated as a key driver of homeostasis and pathological changes in several other body systems, including skeletal muscle and adipose tissue. The glucocorticoid receptor (GR) and MR are structurally and functionally linked, sharing 95% similarity in DNA-binding domains and recognizing many of the same hormone response elements (HREs) as transcriptional regulators of target genes. The role of GR in bone has been defined through several mechanistic studies, whereas the role of MR in bone is understudied. Because mineralocorticoid signaling regulates renal sodium and calcium handling, chronic hyperaldosteronism may indirectly disrupt skeletal homeostasis through urinary calcium wasting and secondary alterations in parathyroid hormone signaling. Furthermore, MR inhibition through MR antagonists (MRAs) has been associated with beneficial skeletal effects, particularly in settings of hyperaldosteronism and 11β-HSD2 deficiency. In this review, we present historical and current scientific findings on the role of genomic MR signaling in bone and extra-skeletal tissues that may be involved in crosstalk with the skeletal system. Furthermore, we also highlight the availability of tools to study MR signaling in the context of the musculoskeletal system.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.