Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42636263›Full record

ArticlePLOS global public health2026

The dichotomy of progress: Public perceptions of global health trends and antibiotic knowledge in Georgia.

Zurab Alkhanishvili

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PLOS global public health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Zurab AlkhanishviliClinical and Translational Medicine Program, Faculty of Medicine, Ivane Javakhishvili Tbilisi State University, Tbilisi, Georgia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2232-6979

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Substantial improvements in global population health have been documented over the past century; however, public perceptions of these long-term trends may not reflect empirical evidence. Misalignment between scientific progress and public understanding can affect trust, policy compliance, and the effectiveness of health governance. A nationally representative cross-sectional survey was conducted in Georgia between May and July 2023 among adults aged 18 years and older. Data were collected through face-to-face interviews using a structured questionnaire. The survey assessed public perceptions of long-term trends in global population growth, life expectancy, and under-five child mortality, as well as knowledge regarding antibiotic effectiveness against viral infections. Descriptive analyses and chi-square tests were applied to examine response patterns across sociodemographic groups. Among 1,876 respondents, recognition of declining child mortality was high (98.0%). In contrast, substantially lower proportions correctly identified increases in global population size (36.0%) and life expectancy (18.0%). Knowledge regarding antibiotic effectiveness was limited, with 32.0% of respondents correctly indicating that antibiotics are ineffective against viral infections. Variation in correct responses was observed across age groups. The findings reveal a persistent gap between documented global health progress and public perceptions in Georgia. While highly visible health indicators appear to be better recognized, broader historical trends and clinically relevant knowledge remain poorly understood. Addressing this progress - perception gap may represent an important component of strengthening public trust and improving the effectiveness of future public health governance.

Identifiers

PMID42636263
PMCPMC13502681

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.