ArticlePLoS genetics2026
Replication-transcription collisions impose DNA strand-specific constraints on gene length in bacteria.
Article in PLoS genetics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Gene length is a peculiar genomic feature that exhibits minimal variation within domains of life, suggesting universal underlying constraints. The length of a gene is primarily influenced by its function, expression level, and mutation risk. Interestingly, many of these factors vary depending on whether the gene is located on the leading or lagging strand of DNA replication. Studies in bacterial species E. coli and B. subtilis have shown that genes tend to be shorter on the lagging strand, potentially reflecting selection to minimize head-on encounters between the replication and transcription machinery. However, the universality of strand-specific constraints on gene length and the evolutionary basis remain unexplored. Here, using comparative genomics, we analyzed gene lengths in the bacterial domain and revealed a non-neutral distribution of gene lengths across leading and lagging strands. Genes and operons are consistently shorter on the lagging strand, irrespective of essentiality or functionality. The length restriction was more pronounced in bacterial species with a dual DNA polymerase mode of replication, which may experience severe head-on collisions between replication and transcription. Remarkably, we found that with increasing length of transcription units, substitution rates increased in the promoters on the lagging strand rather than the coding sequences, revealing a length-dependent and lagging strand-specific cis-regulatory mutational susceptibility. Together, we uncovered a pervasive selection pressure that optimizes gene lengths in a DNA strand-specific manner across bacteria to preserve the genetic integrity of promoters.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.