Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42636245›Full record

ArticlePloS one2026

Forecasting COVID-19 cases in US states using reconstructed incidence data.

Rebecca K Nash, Sangeeta Bhatia, Jack Wardle, Anne Cori, Pierre Nouvellet

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Rebecca K NashMRC Centre for Global Infectious Disease Analysis, School of Public Health, Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5213-4364
Sangeeta BhatiaMRC Centre for Global Infectious Disease Analysis, School of Public Health, Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom.
Jack WardleMRC Centre for Global Infectious Disease Analysis, School of Public Health, Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5363-1653
Anne CoriMRC Centre for Global Infectious Disease Analysis, School of Public Health, Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom.
Pierre NouvelletMRC Centre for Global Infectious Disease Analysis, School of Public Health, Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom.

Funding

Wellcome Trust
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Branching process models are commonly used in infectious disease forecasting and often rely on daily incidence data, but their utility can be restricted if incidence is not reported daily or if reporting becomes less frequent during prolonged outbreaks. In this study, an Expectation Maximisation algorithm is used to reconstruct the daily incidence of COVID-19 cases from weekly case counts. Using data from 13 US states that maintained mostly daily reporting of COVID-19 cases from March 2020 to February 2022, we evaluate forecasting performance by comparing models using the true daily incidence with those using reconstructed daily incidence. Our results show that forecasts generated from reconstructed incidence perform equally well as those generated using true daily incidence. These findings demonstrate the viability of using reconstructed incidence data for real-time forecasting, which could be particularly useful in scenarios where maintaining daily reporting is unsustainable or in settings with limited surveillance capacity.

Indexed as

COVID-19AlgorithmsForecastingHumansIncidenceModels, StatisticalPrediction AlgorithmsSARS-CoV-2United States

Identifiers

PMID42636245
PMCPMC13502656

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.