ArticlePloS one2026
Forecasting COVID-19 cases in US states using reconstructed incidence data.
Article in PloS one, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Branching process models are commonly used in infectious disease forecasting and often rely on daily incidence data, but their utility can be restricted if incidence is not reported daily or if reporting becomes less frequent during prolonged outbreaks. In this study, an Expectation Maximisation algorithm is used to reconstruct the daily incidence of COVID-19 cases from weekly case counts. Using data from 13 US states that maintained mostly daily reporting of COVID-19 cases from March 2020 to February 2022, we evaluate forecasting performance by comparing models using the true daily incidence with those using reconstructed daily incidence. Our results show that forecasts generated from reconstructed incidence perform equally well as those generated using true daily incidence. These findings demonstrate the viability of using reconstructed incidence data for real-time forecasting, which could be particularly useful in scenarios where maintaining daily reporting is unsustainable or in settings with limited surveillance capacity.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.