ArticlePloS one2026
Experiences of family building counseling and perceptions of reproductive technology among adults with sickle cell disease.
Article in PloS one, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
introductionSickle cell disease (SCD) is an autosomal recessive blood disorder that impacts about 100,000 Americans. With increasing life expectancy and more people with SCD reaching reproductive age, there is growing evidence that SCD and some of its therapies decrease fertility. While partner testing and assisted reproductive technology (ART) can enable people with SCD to choose if and how to have biological children, their use remains limited. In this study, we aimed to explore how people with SCD understand the potential fertility implications of SCD and their perceptions of partner testing and ART.
methodsWe recruited adults with SCD ages 18-35 years old who self-identified as being interested in having a biological child in the future and conducted semi-structured individual interviews to discuss previous experiences and perceptions regarding family building planning. Interviews were transcribed and thematically analyzed using inductive coding and the social ecological model.
resultsWe completed 11 interviews with 9 women and 2 men (mean age 30.6 years old, 100% Black or African American). We identified five themes that reached saturation: 1) Providers gave limited support for family building planning; 2) Female participants had a lack of understanding what pregnancy would be like with SCD; 3) Participants felt their partners did not equally share the burden of family building planning; 4) Potential financial burden prevented participants from seriously considering ART; and 5) Participants wanted earlier and frequent discussions with their providers about family building options. Participants identified factors that impacted their family building plans, which fit across the social ecological model. DISCUSSION: Adults with SCD desire further education on the impact of SCD and its treatments on fertility as well as support in their reproductive planning through early, frequent conversations about family building options. Additionally, financial barriers to ART such as insurance coverage must be addressed for adults with SCD.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.