ArticlePloS one2026
Hybrid CNN-embedding fusion with MFCC-SVM for speech emotion recognition: Random vs actor-wise evaluation on CREMA-D.
Article in PloS one, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Speech Emotion Recognition (SER) is an important component of human-centered intelligent systems, yet robust performance remains challenging when speaker identities differ between training and testing. This study presents a protocol-aware and reproducible comparison on the CREMA-D corpus using three pipelines: (i) a classical MFCC-based Support Vector Machine (SVM), (ii) a log-mel Convolutional Neural Network (CNN), and (iii) a lightweight hybrid model that concatenates handcrafted acoustic descriptors with CNN-derived embeddings and uses an SVM classifier. The methodological contribution is not a new standalone classifier; it is the controlled integration of identical preprocessing, random and actor-wise evaluation, five-seed robustness reporting, class-wise error analysis, and CPU-oriented deployment within one experimental framework. The Hybrid approach achieves the best overall performance, obtaining 62.03% ± 0.94% Macro-F1 on the random split and 58.09% ± 1.36% on the actor-wise split, outperforming MFCC+SVM (55.72% ± 0.95% and 52.05% ± 1.95%) and the log-mel CNN (50.20% ± 1.51% and 42.68% ± 1.84%). A Streamlit interface supports WAV upload, live prediction, and export of per-seed confusion matrices and summary figures. The results show that a controlled lightweight fusion framework can improve robustness while making the performance gap between speaker-overlapping and speaker-independent evaluation explicit.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.