ArticlePloS one2026
Driver mutation impact in Chinese hepatocellular carcinoma.
Article in PloS one, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) remains a leading cause of cancer mortality in China. The Chinese Liver Cancer Atlas (CLCA) recently reported whole-genome sequencing of 494 HCC tumors, nominating 23 coding and 31 non-coding driver candidates based on combined P values across multiple algorithms. However, the statistical significance of recurrence alone does not distinguish functionally impactful drivers from neutral passengers. We therefore analyzed cancer effects in the CLCA dataset, quantifying the selective advantage conferred by each mutation. Whole-genome mutation calls from CLCA were analyzed. Gene- and trinucleotide context-specific neutral mutation rates were estimated for all sites. Scaled selection coefficients for every recurrent variant were quantified. Pairwise selective epistasis between genes was quantified and tested. Associations between selected driver mutations and clinical outcomes were examined in the TCGA-LIHC cohort, which included censoring information. We identified canonical drivers CTNNB1, TP53, and the TERT-promoter hotspot as subject to intense positive selection in the CLCA cohort. We also prioritized several lower-prevalence candidate genes and variants with high inferred cancer effect sizes, including P4HA1, STAT3, and IL6ST. These lower-prevalence events should be interpreted as computationally prioritized candidates requiring variant-level functional validation rather than as established novel HCC drivers. Conversely, some genes previously nominated as driver candidates exhibited cancer effects that were indistinguishable from neutrality. These findings show that not all recurrently mutated genes exert equivalent inferred selective effects. Such evolutionary prioritization complements recurrence based driver discovery by ranking somatic variants according to inferred selective effect, while highlighting the need for larger cohorts and functional studies to validate rare high-effect candidates.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.