Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42636196›Full record

Trial reportPloS one2026

Electrical impedance tomography-guided individualized ventilation strategy in patients with trauma-related and postoperative acute respiratory distress syndrome.

Minh Nguyen Viet, Thuy Luu Quang, Dong Trinh Van, Thu Nguyen Dang, Huyen Nguyen Thi

Abstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in PloS one, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Minh Nguyen VietDepartment of Anesthesia and Critical Care, Hanoi Medical University, Hanoi, Vietnam.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0008-1032-7062
Thuy Luu QuangDepartment of Anesthesia and Critical Care, Hanoi Medical University, Hanoi, Vietnam.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4024-730X
Dong Trinh VanDepartment of Anesthesia and Critical Care, Hanoi Medical University, Hanoi, Vietnam.
Thu Nguyen DangDepartment of Anesthesiology, Military Hospital 103, Vietnam Military Medical University, Hanoi, Vietnam.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1326-3681
Huyen Nguyen ThiInstitute of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Bach Mai Hospital, Hanoi, Vietnam.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveOptimal positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) selection in acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) is challenging because of marked regional lung heterogeneity. Electrical impedance tomography (EIT) provides bedside assessment of regional ventilation and may support individualized ventilation by informing PEEP titration, but evidence in trauma- and postoperative-associated ARDS remains limited.

methodsIn this single-center randomized controlled trial, 86 adults with moderate-to-severe trauma- or postoperative-associated ARDS were randomized to an EIT-guided individualized ventilation strategy (n = 43) or a lower-PEEP/FiO2 strategy (n = 43). Four patients were transferred early before analyzable follow-up data were collected; therefore, the modified intention-to-treat population included 42 patients in the EIT group and 40 in the control group. In the EIT group, the multicomponent strategy included EIT monitoring, recruitment maneuvers, decremental PEEP titration, repeated reassessment, and individualized PEEP selection based on the intersection of regional collapse and overdistension curves. The co-primary physiologic outcomes were PaO₂/FiO₂ and static respiratory system compliance (Cstat), assessed longitudinally over 3 days. Secondary outcomes included mechanical power (MP), Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) scores, ventilator-free days, ICU length of stay, barotrauma, and 28-day mortality. Prespecified exploratory analyses evaluated physiologic responses according to pulmonary contusion status. This study was powered for physiologic endpoints rather than clinical outcomes.

resultsPaO₂/FiO₂ improved in both groups, with greater increases in the EIT group during Days 1-3 (Sidak-adjusted p < 0.05). Overall Cstat trajectories were similar between groups. The EIT-guided individualized ventilation strategy was associated with improved oxygenation without increases in plateau pressure or driving pressure. No differential temporal pattern in MP normalized to predicted body weight (MP/PBW) was observed, although overall values were modestly higher in the EIT group. Secondary clinical outcomes were broadly similar between groups. Exploratory analyses suggested greater SOFA score reduction and shorter ICU length of stay in the EIT group. Duration of mechanical ventilation, ventilator-free days, and 28-day mortality were similar between groups. Exploratory subgroup analyses suggested selected later improvements in Cstat among patients without pulmonary contusion, whereas MP/PBW was modestly higher in the EIT group across subgroups.

conclusionsIn trauma- and postoperative-associated ARDS, an EIT-guided individualized ventilation strategy was associated with improved oxygenation compared with a lower-PEEP/FiO₂ strategy, while maintaining plateau and driving pressures within lung-protective ranges. These findings suggest the physiological feasibility of this strategy, but do not establish the independent effect of EIT monitoring or the underlying mechanistic pathway. Larger multicenter studies are needed to determine mechanisms and effects on patient-centered outcomes.

Indexed as

Electric ImpedancePositive-Pressure RespirationPostoperative ComplicationsRespiratory Distress SyndromeTomographyWounds and InjuriesAdultFemaleHumansMaleMiddle Aged

Identifiers

PMID42636196
PMCPMC13502546

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.