ArticleInquiry : a journal of medical care organization, provision and financing
A Commentary on Documenting Birth Outcomes and Fetal Death as a Result of Hanford Site, Washington, Radioactive Airborne and River-Borne Emissions Beginning November 1944.
Article in Inquiry : a journal of medical care organization, provision and financing. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Fallout containing radioactive byproducts of plutonium production at the Hanford atomic weapons facility near Richland, WA secretly blanketed downwind civilian populations, called "Downwinders", throughout the Inland Northwest. Research into health impacts has been hindered by the decades-long delay between these releases which began with the site's start-up in November 1944 and declassification of Hanford operational records disclosing these releases in 1986. Downwinders observed and prior analyses suggested an apparent excess in fetal and neonatal deaths during the 1940s and 1950s. Analysis of radiation released by Hanford, the possible cause of these deaths, has been hampered by data access and time. The few existing studies relied on uncertain, estimated exposure doses from the heavily criticized government-sponsored Hanford Environmental Dose Reconstruction project. Women and children, lower-socioeconomic status, non-white, and Indigenous communities are commonly overburdened by exposures to radioactive contamination and lack of subsequent care and study. This commentary highlights the unanswered questions surrounding pregnancy outcomes impacted by exposures to airborne and river-borne radiation from Hanford, documents the process and barriers to addressing these questions, and calls for increased accessibility of information, especially for impacted communities.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.