ArticleJournal of racial and ethnic health disparities2026
Reducing Racial Disparities in Stroke Thrombolysis Using Fairness-Aware Machine Learning.
Article in Journal of racial and ethnic health disparities, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Racial and ethnic disparities in the administration of intravenous thrombolysis (IVT) for acute ischemic stroke (AIS) remain persistent, raising concerns that bias-both systemic and algorithmic-may influence treatment decisions. While the NIH Stroke Scale (NIHSS) is intended as an objective tool for assessing stroke severity, its application may not be uniform across patient groups. Using differential item functioning (DIF) analysis on a national inpatient cohort of 983,785 patients, we found that minority patients required higher NIHSS scores than White patients to receive IVT, indicating potential bias in score interpretation. To address this, we applied a fairness-aware machine learning framework using counterfactual adjustment to account for historical inequities embedded in clinical data. This approach reduced treatment disparities by 64.8% without compromising predictive accuracy (AUC = 0.89). Our findings illustrate how standardized tools can contribute to inequity and demonstrate the potential of ethical AI to mitigate disparities in real-world stroke care.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42635961What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.