ArticleAIDS and behavior2026
Characteristics of US Counties with Low Pre-exposure Prophylaxis (PrEP) Use and Limited Access to PrEP Prescribing Clinics.
Article in AIDS and behavior, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) is central to Ending the HIV Epidemic, yet uptake in the United States remains low and geographically uneven. Counties with persistently low PrEP use and limited local PrEP-prescribing infrastructure may represent "PrEP deserts," where geographic and structural barriers to HIV prevention converge. Prior studies have relied on travel-time measures or census tract-level analyses, limiting county-level insight. We conducted an ecological study of 2,257 US counties by linking AIDSVu PrEP-use estimates (2019-2023) with 5,856 PrEP-prescribing clinics identified through the CDC National Prevention Information Network. PrEP deserts were defined as counties with PrEP use in the lowest quartile in at least 3 of 5 years and no in-county PrEP-prescribing clinic in 2025. Mixed-effects logistic regression with a state-level random intercept was used to identify characteristics associated with PrEP desert status. Compared with metropolitan counties, micropolitan counties had higher odds of PrEP desert status (aOR: 2.90; 95% CI, 2.10-4.01), as did rural counties (aOR: 2.12; 95% CI, 1.50-3.01). Each 1-percentage-point increase in the proportion of uninsured residents was associated with 17% higher odds of PrEP desert status (aOR: 1.17; 95% CI, 1.04-1.32). Compared with counties in the South, counties in the Midwest had higher odds of PrEP desert status, whereas counties in the Northeast had lower odds. PrEP desert counties were concentrated in nonmetropolitan areas, in the Midwest and South, and in counties with higher uninsurance rates. Expanding pharmacy-based PrEP services and telePrEP, alongside strategies to reduce financial barriers, may improve access and reduce geographic disparities in HIV prevention.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42635951What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.