ArticleDiscover nano2026
Analytical and artificial neural network modeling of double-diffusive magnetized electroosmotic ellis nanofluid flow through a tapered non-uniform channel.
Article in Discover nano, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This study investigates the nonlinear transport dynamics of an Ellis nanofluid in a tapered asymmetric peristaltic channel embedded in a Darcy porous medium under electroosmotic effects. The mathematical model incorporates double-diffusive transport, viscous dissipation, Brownian motion, thermophoresis, magnetohydrodynamics, and electrokinetic interactions. The governing set of coupled nonlinear partial differential equations is transformed into a system of ordinary differential equations using lubrication approximations and Debye-Hückel linearization, with the aid of appropriate dimensionless variables and solved using the Homotopy Perturbation Method (HPM). The dataset generated in HPM is further validated and used to predict the nonlinear flow characteristics, for which an Artificial Neural Network (ANN) is developed and trained. A tangent hyperbolic activation function and the Adam optimization algorithm are used in the ANN and the predictive performance is checked using mean squared error, regression analysis, and error histogram. The results show that the magnetic field reduces the fluid velocity but improves the temperature distribution while the electroosmotic forcing increases the fluid velocity and improves the fluid temperature distribution. Furthermore, Brownian motion makes the temperature rise but reduces the concentration of nanoparticles, and thermophoresis will increase both the temperature and the concentration of nanoparticles. The good agreement between the ANN predictions and the HPM solutions confirms the reliability of the proposed computational framework for analyzing complex electroosmotic Ellis nanofluid transport. The suggested model gives useful insights on the design and optimization of electroosmotic microfluidic devices, targeted drug delivery and lab-on-a-chip technologies using non-Newtonian nanofluids.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.