ReviewClinical rheumatology2026
Mechanism-informed combination therapy and dynamic risk stratification in lupus nephritis: toward durable renal protection.
Review in Clinical rheumatology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Lupus nephritis remains a major determinant of chronic kidney disease, kidney failure, renal flare, and treatment-related damage in systemic lupus erythematosus. Conventional induction and maintenance therapy with glucocorticoids plus mycophenolate mofetil or cyclophosphamide remains an essential backbone, but it is insufficient for some patients with high-risk clinicopathological features, slow early response, or recurrent flares. The therapeutic landscape is shifting from delayed rescue toward earlier, mechanism-informed combination therapy in selected patients. Belimumab, calcineurin inhibitors, and obinutuzumab should not be interpreted as interchangeable escalation steps. Belimumab is most defensible for persistent immune activity, relapse-prone disease, and glucocorticoid-sparing goals. Calcineurin inhibitors are most useful when proteinuria and podocyte or filtration-barrier injury predominate in patients with preserved or relatively preserved kidney function. Obinutuzumab introduces a deeper B-cell-depleting strategy supported by phase III evidence, although questions remain regarding long-term safety, sequencing, retreatment, cost, and implementation. This review proposes a pragmatic framework integrating baseline clinical and histological risk, early proteinuria and estimated glomerular filtration rate trajectories, urinary sediment, serological activity, selected repeat biopsy, and emerging biomarkers. The objective is durable renal protection through fewer flares, preserved kidney function, minimized glucocorticoid exposure, reduced treatment-related harm, and feasible individualized nephroprotection.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42635934What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.