ArticleProbiotics and antimicrobial proteins2026
The Activity of Antimicrobial Peptides (AMPs) Identified Via an Integrated in Silico and Pilot in Vitro Screening Approach Towards ESKAPE Pathogens.
Article in Probiotics and antimicrobial proteins, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Antimicrobial resistance (AMR), driven largely by ESKAPE(E) pathogens, represents a critical global health challenge. The increasing prevalence of multidrug-resistant (MDR) bacteria and the declining effectiveness of conventional antibiotics have created an urgent need for innovative therapeutic agents with novel mechanisms of action. In this study, we aimed to establish a stability-centric computational discovery pipeline to identify and characterize novel antimicrobial peptides (AMPs) with potent and selective bactericidal activity against ESKAPE pathogens, and to validate the lead candidates through experimental in vitro assays. A library of approximately 3,000 AMPs was retrieved from public databases and subjected to in silico screening for physicochemical properties and predicted toxicity. Following filtration, 200 peptides were selected as ligands for molecular docking against essential target proteins from ESKAPE pathogens. Based on docking scores, binding pocket occupancy, and ligand-protein interaction, the top 10 peptides against each bacterium were shortlisted. The four top consensus hits of Vespid Chemotactic Peptide VT1 (VCP-VT1), Taromycin A, CN-AMP1, and Alliumin were selected based on their superior inhibitory profiles. Subsequent peptide-protein docking analyses confirmed their binding modes and interaction patterns. These four candidates were advanced to peptide-protein interaction profiling, followed by pilot in vitro minimum bactericidal concentration (MBC) determination and cytotoxicity assessment on a mammalian cell line. Hierarchical consensus scoring identified VCP-VT1, Taromycin A, CN-AMP1, and Alliumin as the top-ranked binding AMPs. VCP-VT1 was the most potent peptide in preliminary MBC assays, with modest activity against Gram-positive Enterococcus faecalis, Enterococcus faecium and Staphylococcus aureus, and Gram-negative Acinetobacter baumannii and Pseudomonas aeruginosa (MBC50 of 50 µM, MBC > 90 of 100 µM). All peptides showed minimal cytotoxicity against a cultured human cell line and non-toxic ADMET parameters in silico. This reductionist validation of a stability-pre-filtered computational shortlist substantiated VCP-VT1 as a priority bactericidal lead AMP. Its favourable preliminary efficacy and safety margins would warrant further pharmacokinetic optimization and eventual in vivo efficacy studies against recalcitrant multidrug-resistant (MDR) pathogens. This integrated computational-experimental framework provided a generally applicable strategy for accelerating the discovery of peptide-based therapeutics to combat the growing threat of AMR.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42635919What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.