Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42635886›Full record

ArticleGastric cancer : official journal of the International Gastric Cancer Association and the Japanese Gastric Cancer Association2026

Primary outcomes of a phase II trial of laparoscopic/robotic total gastrectomy with spleen-preserving splenic hilar dissection for locally advanced proximal gastric cancer involving the greater curvature (JCOG1809).

Takahiro Kinoshita, Masayuki Yokoyama, Junya Kitadani, Takeshi Omori, Souya Nunobe, Shinji Kuroda, Michitaka Honda, Haruhiko Cho, Masaki Aizawa, Yukinori Kurokawa and 7 more

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Gastric cancer : official journal of the International Gastric Cancer Association and the Japanese Gastric Cancer Association, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Observational
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

17 authors.

Takahiro KinoshitaDepartment of Gastric Surgery, National Cancer Center Hospital East, 6-5-1, Kashiwanoha, Kashiwa, 277-8577, Japan. takkinos@east.ncc.go.jp.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7365-8733
Masayuki YokoyamaJapan Clinical Oncology Group Data Center/Operations Office, National Cancer Center Hospital, Tokyo, Japan.
Junya KitadaniSecond Department of Surgery, Wakayama Medical University, Wakayama, Japan.
Takeshi OmoriDepartment of Gastroenterological Surgery, Osaka International Cancer Institute, , Osaka, Japan.
Souya NunobeDepartment of Gastric Surgery, Cancer Institute Hospital, Tokyo, Japan.
Shinji KurodaDepartment of Gastroenterological Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Dentistry and Pharmaceutical Sciences, Okayama University, Okayama, Japan.
Michitaka HondaDepartment of Surgery, Southern Tohoku General Hospital, Fukushima, Japan.
Haruhiko ChoDepartment of Surgery, Tokyo Metropolitan Komagome Hospital, Tokyo, Japan.
Masaki AizawaDepartment of Gastroenterological Surgery, Niigata Cancer Center Hospital, Niigata, Japan.
Yukinori KurokawaDepartment of Gastroenterological Surgery, Osaka University Graduate School of Medicine, Osaka, Japan.
Tomoya TsukadaDepartment of Surgery, Toyama Prefectural Central Hospital, Toyama, Japan.
Shusuke HarutaDepartment of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Toranomon Hospital, Tokyo, Japan.
Kazunari MisawaDepartment of Gastroenterological Surgery, Aichi Cancer Center, Nagoya, Japan.
Kazuhisa EharaDepartment of Gastroenterological Surgery, Saitama Cancer Center, Saitama, Japan.
Kota KawabataJapan Clinical Oncology Group Data Center/Operations Office, National Cancer Center Hospital, Tokyo, Japan.
Masanori TerashimaDivision of Gastric Surgery, Shizuoka Cancer Center, Shizuoka, Japan.
Takaki YoshikawaDepartment of Gastric Surgery, National Cancer Center Hospital, Tokyo, Japan.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAdvanced proximal gastric cancer (APGC) involving the greater curvature (Gre) sometimes metastasized to the splenic hilar lymph node (No.10 LN), so total gastrectomy with splenectomy has been the standard treatment aiming for complete removal of it; however, the high incidence of complications has been problematic.

methodsWe conducted a multicenter phase-II trial to assess the safety and efficacy of laparoscopic or robotic spleen preserving splenic hilar dissection (LR-SHD) which has the potential to reduce complications. Eligibility criteria included cT2-4a resectable APGC involving the Gre without obvious No.10 metastasis. Macroscopic type 4 and large type 3 (≥ 8 cm) were excluded. LR-SHD with total gastrectomy (D2+No.10) was performed by qualified surgeons. The primary endpoint was the proportion of postoperative pancreatic fistula and/or intra-abdominal abscess (Grade ≥ III). The sample size was 85 considering a threshold of 16% and one-sided alpha of 0.1.

resultsBetween August 2019 and December 2024, 85 eligible patients (cT2/T3/T4a = 32/38/15) were enrolled, and resection was performed in 81. The median operation time was 379 min, and the median blood loss was 30 ml. No.10 metastasis was observed in 12.5% (10/80). Overall complications (Grade ≥ III) occurred in 9.9% (8/81). Pancreatic fistula and/or intra-abdominal abscess occurred in 1.2% (1/81; 80% confidence interval: 0.1-4.7%), which was significantly lower than prespecified threshold (one-sided p < 0.0001). No treatment-related mortality occurred.

conclusionsThis study confirmed the safety and feasibility of LR-SHD when performed by experienced surgeons. This procedure is highly promising for treating APGC with the Gre invasion.

Indexed as

Advanced gastric cancerLaparoscopic gastrectomyRobotic gastrectomySplenic hilar lymph node dissection

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.