ArticleGastric cancer : official journal of the International Gastric Cancer Association and the Japanese Gastric Cancer Association2026
Primary outcomes of a phase II trial of laparoscopic/robotic total gastrectomy with spleen-preserving splenic hilar dissection for locally advanced proximal gastric cancer involving the greater curvature (JCOG1809).
Article in Gastric cancer : official journal of the International Gastric Cancer Association and the Japanese Gastric Cancer Association, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Lack of oncological significance of prophylactic splenectomy for type 4 gastric cancer invading the greater curvature: a multicenter retrospective study.Scientific reports · 2026Observational
- Comparison of the efficacy and safety of single-incision versus multi-port laparoscopic D2 lymphadenectomy for locally advanced gastric cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Journal of gastrointestinal oncology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
17 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundAdvanced proximal gastric cancer (APGC) involving the greater curvature (Gre) sometimes metastasized to the splenic hilar lymph node (No.10 LN), so total gastrectomy with splenectomy has been the standard treatment aiming for complete removal of it; however, the high incidence of complications has been problematic.
methodsWe conducted a multicenter phase-II trial to assess the safety and efficacy of laparoscopic or robotic spleen preserving splenic hilar dissection (LR-SHD) which has the potential to reduce complications. Eligibility criteria included cT2-4a resectable APGC involving the Gre without obvious No.10 metastasis. Macroscopic type 4 and large type 3 (≥ 8 cm) were excluded. LR-SHD with total gastrectomy (D2+No.10) was performed by qualified surgeons. The primary endpoint was the proportion of postoperative pancreatic fistula and/or intra-abdominal abscess (Grade ≥ III). The sample size was 85 considering a threshold of 16% and one-sided alpha of 0.1.
resultsBetween August 2019 and December 2024, 85 eligible patients (cT2/T3/T4a = 32/38/15) were enrolled, and resection was performed in 81. The median operation time was 379 min, and the median blood loss was 30 ml. No.10 metastasis was observed in 12.5% (10/80). Overall complications (Grade ≥ III) occurred in 9.9% (8/81). Pancreatic fistula and/or intra-abdominal abscess occurred in 1.2% (1/81; 80% confidence interval: 0.1-4.7%), which was significantly lower than prespecified threshold (one-sided p < 0.0001). No treatment-related mortality occurred.
conclusionsThis study confirmed the safety and feasibility of LR-SHD when performed by experienced surgeons. This procedure is highly promising for treating APGC with the Gre invasion.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42635886What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.