ArticleDiscover oncology2026
A single-center study of prognostic impact and treatment implications of cribriform pattern in prostate cancer.
Article in Discover oncology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionCribriform prostate cancer (cPCa) is increasingly recognized for its aggressive behavior and poor prognosis compared to conventional acinar adenocarcinoma. It is associated with adverse pathological features and excludes patients from active surveillance, highlighting the need for accurate identification. This study aimed to evaluate oncologic outcomes and characterize subsequent treatment patterns in a single-center cohort of patients with cribriform prostate cancer. MATERIALS: We retrospectively analyzed 401 patients who underwent prostate biopsy and radical prostatectomy (RP) between 01/2020 and 12/2021 at a high-volume tertiary center. Of these, 112 patients had cPCa. Data on biopsy and prostatectomy specimens, post-treatment management, biochemical recurrence, and follow-up until August 2025 were collected. Cox regression was used to identify predictors of poor oncologic outcomes.
resultsOf the 112 patients with cPCa, 66.1% had high-risk disease, and 30.4% had intermediate-risk disease. Biopsy detected 40 cases, with an additional 72 identified in the final post-RP specimen. At diagnosis, 6.3% had metastatic disease. At the time of surgery, 19.2% had lymph node metastases, and 16.4% had positive surgical margins. The median follow-up was 54 months. Univariable analysis showed that high Gleason score (≥ 8), lymph node positivity, and locally advanced stage were associated with decreased systemic therapy-free survival. In metastatic disease, no differences were found in therapy duration or time to castration-resistant prostate cancer.
conclusioncPCa is an aggressive subtype with poor prognosis, characterized by high-risk features and early need for systemic therapy. These findings underscore the need for prospective studies exploring multimodal treatments for this high-risk population.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.