Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42635874›Full record

ReviewCurrent heart failure reports2026

Managing Cardiogenic Shock in the Era of Multimodal Mechanical Support: Bridging to Transplant or Recovery.

Jorge A Ortega-Hernández, Luca Baldetti, Guglielmo Gallone, Giulio Cacioli, Pier Paolo Bocchino, Gabriela Rojas-Cruz, Raúl Rodrigo Neri-Bale, Antonio Loforte, Jaime Hernández-Montfort

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Current heart failure reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Jorge A Ortega-HernándezCoronary Care Unit, Instituto Nacional de Cardiología Ignacio Chávez, Juan Badiano 1, Sección XVI, Tlalpan, Ciudad de México, 14080, México. jorgeoh1992@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6019-2644
Luca BaldettiCardiac Intensive Care Unit, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5986-049X
Guglielmo GalloneDivision of Cardiology, "Città della Salute e della Scienza" Hospital, Turin, Italy.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8011-6844
Giulio CacioliCardiac Surgery and Heart Transplant Unit, Azienda Ospedaliera San Camillo Forlanini, Rome, Italy.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3813-1754
Pier Paolo BocchinoDivision of Cardiology, "Città della Salute e della Scienza" Hospital, Turin, Italy.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7868-1852
Gabriela Rojas-CruzCardiac & Intensive Care Unit, Hospital Ángeles del Pedregal, Camino Sta. Teresa 1055-S, Héroes de Padierna, Héroes de Padierna, La Magdalena Contreras, Ciudad de México, 10700, México.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0000-7624-0623
Raúl Rodrigo Neri-BaleAdvanced Heart Failure and Recovery Program for Central Texas, Baylor Scott & White Health, 302 University Blvd, Round Rock, TX, 78665, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0004-6414-7287
Antonio LoforteDivision of Cardiology, "Città della Salute e della Scienza" Hospital, Turin, Italy.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3689-0477
Jaime Hernández-MontfortAdvanced Heart Failure and Recovery Program for Central Texas, Baylor Scott & White Health, 302 University Blvd, Round Rock, TX, 78665, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3095-9151

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purpose of reviewTo review the contemporary management of cardiogenic shock in the era of multimodal temporary mechanical circulatory support, with emphasis on phenotype-guided device selection, serial trajectory assessment, and bridging toward recovery, durable left ventricular assist device implantation, or heart transplantation. RECENT

findingsTemporary mechanical circulatory support is now used to influence clinical outcomes, not just as rescue therapy. Devices like intra-aortic balloon pumps, microaxial flow pumps, and venoarterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation affect heart function and recovery differently; their use should be tailored to the type of ventricular failure and monitored with hemodynamics and imaging. Expanded focus on upper-limb access and prolonged support has broadened temporary support's role in bridging patients to decision, recovery, or transplant. Cardiogenic shock remains a leading cause of mortality in acute myocardial infarction and advanced heart failure despite major advances in temporary mechanical circulatory support. Contemporary outcomes depend not only on device availability, but on matching support intensity to shock phenotype, recognizing trajectory early, minimizing complications, and preserving end-organ function. This review summarizes current evidence on device-specific physiology, escalation and weaning, pulmonary vascular considerations, and post-transplant outcomes, and proposes an integrated framework for individualized, trajectory-based decision-making.

Indexed as

Extracorporeal Membrane OxygenationHeart-Assist DevicesHeart TransplantationIntra-Aortic Balloon PumpingRecovery of FunctionShock, CardiogenicBridge TherapyHeart FailureHemodynamicsHumansAdvanced heart failureCardiogenic shockHemodynamic profilingMechanical circulatory supportMicroaxial flow pumpVentricular unloading

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.