ReviewSeminars in immunopathology2026
The Lactate-lactylation circuitry in kidney fibrosis: cellular crosstalk from tubular metabolic reprogramming to macrophage effector functions.
Review in Seminars in immunopathology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Kidney fibrosis is the histopathological endpoint of chronic kidney disease, yet antifibrotic trials targeting individual molecular nodes have repeatedly failed to translate into patient benefit. The pattern suggests that renal fibrosis is sustained by a recurrent circuit rather than a linear cascade. Here we propose a tubular-macrophage lactate-lactylation circuit that integrates tubular and macrophage evidence into a single cellular axis. Injured tubular cells reprogramme glycolytically and generate a sustained lactate-rich niche. On both sides of the tubulointerstitial interface, lactate is converted into histone and non-histone lactyl-lysine (Kla) marks that lock in profibrotic transcription, derange mitochondrial function and dampen innate immune surveillance. Macrophage outputs, profibrotic macrophage programmes, innate-immune memory, paracrine activation of fibroblasts/pericytes and, in selected contexts, macrophage-to-myofibroblast transition, feed back on tubular cells and the stromal compartment through bidirectional vesicular and cytokine signalling, generating the recurrent topology that distinguishes a circuit from a linear pathway. The supporting evidence is uneven across compartments; we stratify each key claim by tier of evidence and map the circuit onto current biomarker and therapeutic strategies. The framework clarifies why single-node interventions have not succeeded, and points to combinations that engage substrate supply, lactylation machinery, transcriptional output and intercellular feedback in parallel.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42635816What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.