ReviewAbdominal radiology (New York)2026
Multimodal artificial intelligence in prostate cancer: integrating multiparametric MRI with clinicopathological, molecular, and functional imaging data.
Review in Abdominal radiology (New York), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Multimodal artificial intelligence (AI) is reshaping prostate cancer imaging by moving beyond MRI-only algorithms toward models that integrate multiparametric MRI (mpMRI) with clinical variables, pathology, genomics, ultrasound, and prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA) positron emission tomography (PET). This review summarizes the deep-learning architectures, fusion strategies, representative applications, and implementation challenges of mpMRI-centered multimodal AI. Convolutional neural networks and U-Net variants remain central to image encoding and segmentation; transformers and attention modules support cross-modal interaction, whereas generative adversarial networks are used mainly for augmentation, synthesis, and image restoration. Current evidence is strongest for combining MRI with routinely available clinical variables, for which several studies have reported incremental discrimination, calibration, or net benefit relative to single-modality models. Cross-modality integration with ultrasound and PSMA PET may support biopsy targeting and local staging, whereas pathology-clinical fusion may support prognosis. Foundation models and large language models may facilitate transferable representation learning and conversion of unstructured reports and clinical notes into structured multimodal inputs, but hallucination, provenance, privacy, and external-validation concerns preclude autonomous use. Active surveillance is an emerging longitudinal application because serial MRI, PSA kinetics, repeat biopsy, and patient-level outcomes must be aligned over time. However, domain shift across institutions, scanners, protocols, tracers, pathology workflows, and patient populations, together with labeling and outcome-definition heterogeneity, remains a central barrier. Translation into practice will require modality-specific harmonization, leakage-resistant validation, missing-modality robustness, probability calibration, uncertainty estimation, transparent disclosure of input availability and model provenance, prospective impact studies, and multidisciplinary governance. With these safeguards, multimodal AI may become a useful component of precision prostate cancer care.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42635792What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.