Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42635772›Full record

ArticleTAG. Theoretical and applied genetics. Theoretische und angewandte Genetik2026

Genomic prediction vs. gene-based crop models: a case study on rice trait prediction.

Jinhan Zhang, Weijie Tang, Hongwei Ma, Wenliang Yan, Ioannis N Athanasiadis, Shaoyuan Zhang, Leilei Liu, Bing Liu, Liujun Xiao, Yan Zhu and 3 more

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in TAG. Theoretical and applied genetics. Theoretische und angewandte Genetik, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Jinhan Zhang *Sanya Institute of Nanjing Agricultural University, Sanya, 572025, Hainan, China.
Weijie Tang *Institute of Germplasm Resources and Biotechnology, Jiangsu Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Nanjing, 210014, Jiangsu, China.
Hongwei MaNational Engineering and Technology Center for Information Agriculture, Engineering Research Center of Smart Agriculture, Ministry of Education, Key Laboratory for Crop System Analysis and Decision Making, Ministry of Agriculture, Nanjing Agricultural University, Nanjing, 210095, Jiangsu, China.
Wenliang YanNational Engineering and Technology Center for Information Agriculture, Engineering Research Center of Smart Agriculture, Ministry of Education, Key Laboratory for Crop System Analysis and Decision Making, Ministry of Agriculture, Nanjing Agricultural University, Nanjing, 210095, Jiangsu, China.
Ioannis N AthanasiadisArtificial Intelligence Group, Wageningen University & Research, Droevendaalsesteeg 1, 6708PB, Wageningen, The Netherlands.
Shaoyuan ZhangNational Engineering and Technology Center for Information Agriculture, Engineering Research Center of Smart Agriculture, Ministry of Education, Key Laboratory for Crop System Analysis and Decision Making, Ministry of Agriculture, Nanjing Agricultural University, Nanjing, 210095, Jiangsu, China.
Leilei LiuNational Engineering and Technology Center for Information Agriculture, Engineering Research Center of Smart Agriculture, Ministry of Education, Key Laboratory for Crop System Analysis and Decision Making, Ministry of Agriculture, Nanjing Agricultural University, Nanjing, 210095, Jiangsu, China.
Bing LiuNational Engineering and Technology Center for Information Agriculture, Engineering Research Center of Smart Agriculture, Ministry of Education, Key Laboratory for Crop System Analysis and Decision Making, Ministry of Agriculture, Nanjing Agricultural University, Nanjing, 210095, Jiangsu, China.
Liujun XiaoNational Engineering and Technology Center for Information Agriculture, Engineering Research Center of Smart Agriculture, Ministry of Education, Key Laboratory for Crop System Analysis and Decision Making, Ministry of Agriculture, Nanjing Agricultural University, Nanjing, 210095, Jiangsu, China.
Yan ZhuNational Engineering and Technology Center for Information Agriculture, Engineering Research Center of Smart Agriculture, Ministry of Education, Key Laboratory for Crop System Analysis and Decision Making, Ministry of Agriculture, Nanjing Agricultural University, Nanjing, 210095, Jiangsu, China.
Weixing CaoNational Engineering and Technology Center for Information Agriculture, Engineering Research Center of Smart Agriculture, Ministry of Education, Key Laboratory for Crop System Analysis and Decision Making, Ministry of Agriculture, Nanjing Agricultural University, Nanjing, 210095, Jiangsu, China.
Yunhui ZhangInstitute of Germplasm Resources and Biotechnology, Jiangsu Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Nanjing, 210014, Jiangsu, China. zhangyh@jaas.ac.cn.
Liang TangSanya Institute of Nanjing Agricultural University, Sanya, 572025, Hainan, China. tangl@njau.edu.cn.

Funding

National Key Research and Development Program of China 2022YFD2001001
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Conventional breeding for ideotypes in target environments remains challenging due to genotype-by-environment interactions and the genetic complexity of key agronomic traits. Traditional multi-environment field trials are costly and time-consuming, limiting rapid genetic gain. These challenges highlight the need for digital tools to support rice breeding. However, two major approaches, genomic prediction (GP) and gene-based crop models (GBCMs), have distinct advantages. In this study, a dataset derived from a natural rice population comprising 210 genotypes, genotyped with about 650,000 markers, rice dry matter, and yield across three environments, was used to develop two genomic prediction models, genomic best linear unbiased prediction (GBLUP) and a convolutional neural network (CNN), together with a gene-based crop modeling framework. The effectiveness of these models in predicting rice traits and assisting in breeding selection was subsequently evaluated. Prediction results indicated that biomass and yield could be effectively predicted by all models, with Normalized Root Mean Square Error (NRMSE) values ranging from 10.60% to 18.59% and 9.93% to 18.19%, respectively. In terms of predictive accuracy, parameter-based crop models achieved the highest predictive accuracy, although it was confined to theoretical simulations. This was followed by the GBCM and CNN, whereas the GBLUP exhibited the lowest performance. Furthermore, GGE biplot analysis revealed the predictions of the GBCM aligned more closely with field observations than those of the CNN, emphasizing the potential of GBCM as a practical surrogate for digital breeding. These results provide valuable insights into modeling genotype-by-environment interactions and support the development of data-informed breeding strategies for future rice improvement.

Indexed as

Crops, AgriculturalGenome, PlantGenomicsModels, GeneticOryzaPlant BreedingConvolutional Neural NetworksGene-Environment InteractionGenotypePhenotypePrediction AlgorithmsQuantitative Trait Loci

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.