ArticleSchmerz (Berlin, Germany)2026
[Interventional pain treatment in Austria : Results of a survey among specialized pain therapists].
Article in Schmerz (Berlin, Germany), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundInterventional procedures are an integral component of multimodal pain management; however, their clinical use and indications remain controversial due to heterogeneous evidence regarding their efficacy. Until now, no systematic data have been available on the prevalence and clinical practice of interventional pain management techniques in Austria.
objectiveThe aim of this study was to assess the current clinical practice of interventional pain management in specialized pain centers in Austria and to discuss these findings in the context of the available evidence.
methodsAn anonymous, web-based questionnaire was distributed to specialized pain physicians holding the Austrian diploma in "Specialized Pain Therapy" (Spezielle Schmerztherapie). Participants were surveyed regarding the frequency of use, procedural techniques and indications for interventional pain management procedures. The questionnaire included sympathetic and sensory nerve blocks, neuraxial techniques, intrathecal drug delivery, spinal cord stimulation, auricular vagus nerve stimulation and botulinum toxin injections.
resultsOf the 51 pain centers contacted, 22 participated in the survey (response rate: 43.1%). The most frequently performed procedures were selective nerve root blocks, facet nerve blocks and plexus blocks. Sympathetic blocks and neuromodulation techniques were used less frequently. Most procedures were performed using anatomical landmarks and ultrasound guidance, while imaging techniques such as computed tomography (CT) or fluoroscopy (C-arm guidance) were used selectively. The leading indications were neuropathic pain syndromes and conditions with a neuropathic pain component, particularly radicular back pain, complex regional pain syndrome (CRPS), postherpetic neuralgia and cancer-related pain.
conclusionInterventional pain management is widely used in specialized pain centers in Austria, particularly for selected neuropathic pain syndromes. These findings highlight the importance of interventional techniques as part of multimodal pain management while also illustrating the discrepancy between their widespread clinical use and the limited supporting evidence. Structured patient selection and further high-quality scientific evaluation of interventional pain management procedures are warranted.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42635761What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.