ArticleNeuroradiology2026
Brain cone-beam CT image quality improvement using a deep-learning-based denoising method: a multicenter retrospective study.
Article in Neuroradiology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeDeep learning (DL) denoising may improve cone-beam CT (CBCT) image quality for point-of-care stroke assessment in the interventional suite. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the impact of a DL-based denoising algorithm on objective and subjective image quality in brain CBCT using both standard circular and advanced dual-axis trajectories.
methodsWe retrospectively analyzed 20 noncontrast brain CBCT acquisitions (Karolinska: 10 standard circular; St Michael's: 10 dual-axis). A DL-based denoising algorithm was applied at three strengths (Minimal, Medium, High) and compared to standard images with no additional denoising. Objective metrics (noise, signal-to-noise ratio (SNR), contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR), artifact indices) were measured using standardized ROIs. Six experts rated subjective image quality on 5-point Likert scales. Paired tests with Bonferroni correction were used for comparisons.
resultsHigh-level DL denoising significantly improved all objective metrics (noise, SNR, CNR, artifact indices) for both thin and thick slices (all p<.001). It doubled gray-white matter CNR (thin slices: 2.31 vs. 1.08), reduced noise, and improved subcalvarial and posterior fossa artifact indices. Subjectively, high-level denoising yielded higher median ratings for noise, texture, sharpness, brain parenchyma visualization, CSF spaces, and confidence in assessing ischemia and hemorrhage (all p<.001). Improvements were consistent for both acquisition techniques, and perceived artifact severity did not differ (p>.99). Inter-reader agreement was substantial.
conclusionThe DL-based denoising algorithm significantly improved objective and subjective brain CBCT image-quality; no difference in perceived artifact severity was detected. These findings support further evaluation of deep learning-enhanced CBCT denoising for brain imaging in the interventional suite.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42635759What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.