Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42635749›Full record

ArticleGraefe's archive for clinical and experimental ophthalmology = Albrecht von Graefes Archiv fur klinische und experimentelle Ophthalmologie2026

5-year outcomes of iStent micro-bypass vs. Kahook dual blade goniotomy in open angle glaucoma.

Ejaz Ansari

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Graefe's archive for clinical and experimental ophthalmology = Albrecht von Graefes Archiv fur klinische und experimentelle Ophthalmologie, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Ejaz AnsariDepartment of Ophthalmology, Maidstone & Tunbridge Wells Hospitals Maidstone, Kent, ME16 9QQ, UK. e.ansari@nhs.net.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8943-8209

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeLong-term comparison of efficacy and safety of i-Stent versus KDB goniotomy combined with phacoemulsification through to 5 years.

methodsA retrospective chart review of 88 patients that received iStent or KDB in combination with phacoemulsification at a single centre between January 2014 and January 2019. Outcome measures were proportion of eyes achieving ≥ 20% reduction of IOP, drop dependence through to 5 years and change in visual field mean deviation (MD) at year 5 compared to baseline. Early to moderate stage of glaucoma.

resultsNo significant difference between groups for IOP reduction (p = 0.3) or visual field MD (p = 0.85) at all time points through to 5 years. Significantly lower drop dependence favouring KDB at all time points (p < 0.001 year 1; p = 0.02 year 5). Lower rate of secondary procedures following KDB (7.7% vs. 14% p = 0.48). Adverse events following iStent and KDB: hyphaema (5.5% v 10% p = 0.70), corneal oedema (8% v 2% p = 0.30), rebound anterior uveitis (5.5% v 2% p = 0.57). Complications resolved within 2 weeks with no serious incidents (loss of VA by ≥ 2 Snellen lines/ 0.3 logMAR).

conclusionEach procedure provided comparable long-term IOP reduction and visual field stability over five years. KDB goniotomy resulted in significantly less drop dependence throughout with fewer associated secondary procedures. Adverse events were infrequent and mild, with no serious complications observed.

Indexed as

GlaucomaGoniotomyi-StentKDBMIGS

Identifiers

PMID42635749

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.