ArticlePediatric cardiology2026
PDA Stenting with Versus Without Pre-Procedural 3D Reconstruction: Impact on Radiation Exposure and Procedural Outcomes.
Article in Pediatric cardiology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Managing patients with patent ductus arteriosus (PDA) and complex anatomical features, such as tortuosity and branching anomalies, remains a challenge in interventional cardiology. Recent advances in three-dimensional (3D) reconstruction and morphologic analysis of ductal anatomy have shown promise in improving procedural outcomes. This study evaluates the utility of 3D reconstruction in pre-procedural planning for PDA stenting. This retrospective, single-center study included patients who underwent PDA stenting from June 2018 to March 2025. Pre-procedural CT and 3D reconstructions were performed for a subset of patients, allowing for detailed analysis of ductal tortuosity. Procedural outcomes, including radiation exposure/dose, procedure time, and the need for reintervention were compared between the 3D- and non-3D-guided groups. A total of 46 patients were included in the analysis, with 27 having preprocedural 3D-guided planning. The 3D group demonstrated significantly lower mean effective radiation dose (77 vs. 114 mSv, p = 0.0331). Case length and fluoroscopy time were shorter but not statistically significant. The need for catheter-based reintervention tended to be lower in the 3D group (10% vs. 18%, p = 0.06), but the difference did not reach statistical significance. Stratification by tortuosity type regardless of 3D implementation did not have statistically significant correlation to patient outcomes. Preprocedural 3D reconstruction is a valuable tool in planning PDA interventions with a high success rate and significantly lower radiation exposure. These findings support the incorporation of 3D modeling into routine clinical practice for complex PDA cases, potentially improving procedural efficiency and patient outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42635738What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.