ArticleOsteoporosis international : a journal established as result of cooperation between the European Foundation for Osteoporosis and the National Osteoporosis Foundation of the USA2026
Preventing fragility fractures: AI-based opportunistic osteoporosis detection in routine CT .
Article in Osteoporosis international : a journal established as result of cooperation between the European Foundation for Osteoporosis and the National Osteoporosis Foundation of the USA, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This study shows that an artificial intelligence tool can identify patterns of reduced bone mineral density in routine CT scans that would otherwise remain unreported. Compared to radiologists, the AI system flagged substantially more cases with potential signs of reduced bone mineral density, offering a scalable approach to support earlier identification of individuals who may benefit from further assessment. PURPOSE: Osteoporosis often goes unrecognized in routine computed tomography (CT) scans performed for unrelated indications, leading to diagnosis only after a fragility fracture occurs. We present an artificial intelligence (AI)-based tool for opportunistic bone mineral density (BMD) assessment on contrast-enhanced and native CT scans of the entire spine to enable detection of patterns suggestive of reduced BMD.
methodsWe trained a neural network to classify BMD of individual vertebrae as normal, osteopenic, or osteoporotic, using labels derived from Dual-Energy X-ray Absorptiometry (DXA) T-scores as the reference standard. The training dataset included 1084 sagittal spine CT series from 526 patients across multiple US and German centers, encompassing cervical, thoracic, and lumbar regions. The model was evaluated on an independent holdout set of 270 patients. Additionally, in a retrospective analysis of 354 patients who later sustained fragility fractures, the AI model was applied to contrast or native CT scans acquired 12-24 months prior to the fracture event to assess how often the AI model would flag patterns suggestive of reduced BMD in patients who subsequently sustained fragility fractures.
resultsOn the independent holdout set, the algorithm achieved a specificity of 84% and a sensitivity of 67%. In the retrospective study, the AI model flagged patterns of reduced BMD in 184 of 354 patients (87 osteoporotic, 97 osteopenic), while radiologists had reported reduced BMD in only 41 cases.
conclusionTo the best of our knowledge, this AI model is the first to classify BMD across the entire spine on both contrast and native CT scans. It demonstrates robust real-world performance and offers a promising approach for scalable opportunistic BMD screening in routine CT imaging.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42635729What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.