ArticleUpdates in surgery2026
Transitioning from hand-sewn to circular stapled cervical anastomosis after minimally invasive esophagectomy: a Western centre propensity score matching analysis.
Article in Updates in surgery, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Cervical esophagogastric anastomosis remains a technically challenging step in esophageal surgery. Hand-sewn techniques have traditionally been favored for their adaptability, while circular stapled anastomosis has gained popularity for its reproducibility and efficiency. However, structured comparative data for cervical anastomosis remain scarce and conflicting. A retrospective monocentric analysis was conducted, based on a prospectively maintained database, on consecutive patients who underwent minimally invasive three-stage esophagectomy (McKeown) with cervical anastomosis for esophageal cancer (January 2018-March 2025). Since February 2022, we have adopted circular stapled cervical anastomosis for all patients, without reverting back. To reduce confounding, propensity score matching was performed using key clinical and oncologic variables. Outcomes of interest included anastomotic leak, anastomotic stricture, postoperative complications, time to oral intake, and hospital length of stay. A total of 127 patients were included, with 36 matched pairs analyzed. The circular stapled group had a lower incidence of anastomotic leak (3/36, 8.3% vs. 7/36, 19.4%) and stricture (6/36, 16.7% vs. 11/36, 30.6%), though differences were not statistically significant. On multivariable analysis, high tumor location was the sole independent predictor of anastomotic leak (OR 3.01, p = 0.023), whereas the circular stapled technique demonstrated a non-significant protective trend (OR 0.56, p = 0.279). Time to resumption of oral intake was significantly shorter in the stapled group (9 vs. 10 days, p = 0.007), and length of hospital stay was reduced (14 vs. 19 days, p < 0.001). Overall complication rates and severity were comparable between groups. The transition from hand-sewn to circular stapled cervical anastomosis was feasible, safe, and associated with improved short-term recovery. Although the mechanical approach does not independently reduce leak rates, its high reproducibility and capacity for technical standardization support its role as a valuable strategy for cervical reconstruction following minimally invasive esophagectomy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42635717What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.