Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42635715›Full record

ArticleUpdates in surgery2026

Quality of life in breast cancer survivors: a comparative analysis between breast conservative treatment (BCT) and post-mastectomy breast reconstruction (PMBR) using either autologous or prosthetic reconstruction.

Emanuele Cammarata, Federico Coppola, Giovanni Zabbia, Mara Franza, Salvatore Vieni, Calogero Cipolla, Adriana Cordova, Francesca Toia

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Updates in surgery, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Emanuele CammarataPlastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Department of Precision Medicine in Medical, Surgical and Critical Care Area (Me.Pre.C.C.), University of Palermo, Via del Vespro 129, 90127, Palermo, PA, Italy.
Federico CoppolaPlastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Department of Precision Medicine in Medical, Surgical and Critical Care Area (Me.Pre.C.C.), University of Palermo, Via del Vespro 129, 90127, Palermo, PA, Italy.
Giovanni ZabbiaPlastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Department of Precision Medicine in Medical, Surgical and Critical Care Area (Me.Pre.C.C.), University of Palermo, Via del Vespro 129, 90127, Palermo, PA, Italy.
Mara FranzaPlastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Department of Precision Medicine in Medical, Surgical and Critical Care Area (Me.Pre.C.C.), University of Palermo, Via del Vespro 129, 90127, Palermo, PA, Italy. mara.franza@unipa.it.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5799-1461
Salvatore VieniOncological Surgery Unit, Department of Precision Medicine in Medical, Surgical and Critical Care Area (Me.Pre.C.C.), University of Palermo, Via del Vespro 129, 90127, Palermo, Italy.
Calogero CipollaOncological Surgery Unit, Department of Precision Medicine in Medical, Surgical and Critical Care Area (Me.Pre.C.C.), University of Palermo, Via del Vespro 129, 90127, Palermo, Italy.
Adriana CordovaPlastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Department of Precision Medicine in Medical, Surgical and Critical Care Area (Me.Pre.C.C.), University of Palermo, Via del Vespro 129, 90127, Palermo, PA, Italy.
Francesca ToiaPlastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Department of Precision Medicine in Medical, Surgical and Critical Care Area (Me.Pre.C.C.), University of Palermo, Via del Vespro 129, 90127, Palermo, PA, Italy.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Breast cancer remains the most commonly diagnosed cancer in women, with surgical intervention as a cornerstone treatment. Options include breast-conserving therapy (BCT) and mastectomy with or without post-mastectomy breast reconstruction (PMBR). This study aimed to compare quality of life (QoL) outcomes between breast-conserving therapy (BCT) and post-mastectomy breast reconstruction (PMBR), with either autologous DIEP flap or expander/prosthetic reconstruction. A single-institution retrospective study was conducted of 200 breast cancer patients treated from January 2016 to December 2021. Patients were divided into three groups: BCT, PMBR with DIEP flap, and implant-based PMBR. QoL and satisfaction were evaluated using the BREAST-Q questionnaire 12 months post-surgery. Statistical significance was assessed through ANOVA test, with statistically significance if p < 0.05. BCT was associated with significantly higher psychological well-being than prosthetic reconstruction (p < 0.0001), as was autologous reconstruction (p < 0.0044). Sexual well-being scores favored BCT over prosthetic reconstruction (p < 0.0001) and autologous over prosthetic reconstruction (p < 0.0001). Physical well-being scores were also significantly higher in the BCT and DIEP groups than in the prosthetic group. While satisfaction with care showed no significant differences across groups, DIEP flap reconstruction exhibited comparable, and in some cases superior, scores in relation to BCT. BCT and DIEP flap reconstruction are associated with improved psycho-physical and psycho-social outcomes compared to prosthetic reconstruction. When feasible, DIEP flap reconstruction may be associated with the best QoL outcomes after mastectomy. However, further large-scale studies are recommended to confirm these findings and enhance decision-making for optimal patient-centered care.

Indexed as

Breast cancerBreast conserving therapyBREAST-QPatient-reported outcomesPost-mastectomy breast reconstructionQuality of life

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.