Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42635668›Full record

ArticleEuropean spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society2026

Fully navigated biportal endoscopic lumbar decompression using non-invasive surface registration: a single-institution technical feasibility series.

Christopher Talbot, Nelson Sofoluke, Sukreet Raju, Juanmarco Gutierrez, Daniel Refai

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Christopher TalbotAdventHealth Medical Group Spine and Neurosurgery, Louisville, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3631-6256
Nelson SofolukeDepartment of Neurosurgery, Emory University, Atlanta, USA. nsofoluke@emory.edu.
Sukreet RajuDepartment of Neurosurgery, Emory University, Atlanta, USA.
Juanmarco GutierrezDepartment of Neurosurgery, Emory University, Atlanta, USA.
Daniel RefaiDepartment of Neurosurgery, Emory University, Atlanta, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeBiportal endoscopic spine surgery offers advantages over open approaches but presents challenges with anatomical orientation. We describe a reproducible technique for fully navigated biportal endoscopic lumbar decompression using a non-invasive surface reference and continuously tracked working instruments, and report operative metrics and safety outcomes in an initial consecutive series.

methodsSeven consecutive patients underwent fully navigated biportal endoscopic lumbar decompression between June and November 2025 after institutional review board approval. The Stryker navigation platform was paired with intraoperative computed tomography (Ziehm 3D), a SpineMask Tracker surface reference, and NavLock quick-release adapters permitting continuous tracking of the working cannula, radiofrequency probe, high-speed burr, and 30-degree endoscope. Decompression followed the standardized five-step "Z" sequence, with en bloc "butterfly/two-wings" ligamentum flavum resection where indicated.

resultsThree men and four women (mean age 71.0 ± 19.4 years; mean body mass index 30.6 ± 5.7 kg/m²) underwent decompression at nine lumbar levels. Common pathologies included central canal stenosis (86%), spondylolisthesis (57%), and lateral recess stenosis (57%). Mean operative time was 157.7 ± 73.9 min, fluoroscopy time 1.4 ± 0.5 min, and cumulative reference air kerma 70.3 ± 39.6 mGy, a mean of 87% of which was contributed by the intraoperative cone-beam CT (3D) acquisitions rather than by two-dimensional fluoroscopy. There were no registration failures, conversions, or intraoperative complications, and no 30-day reoperations or readmissions; five of seven patients were discharged the same day.

conclusionFully navigated biportal endoscopic lumbar decompression using a non-invasive surface reference and continuously tracked instruments is technically feasible and integrates into a standardized decompression workflow without disrupting it. The technique is reproducible and provides a platform for prospective comparative evaluation.

Indexed as

Biportal endoscopic spine surgeryIntraoperative computed tomographyLigamentum flavumLumbar decompressionMinimally invasive spine surgerySpinal navigation

Identifiers

PMID42635668

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.