ArticleExperimental brain research2026
Effect of spatial attention on anatomical and external reference frames in tactile localization.
Article in Experimental brain research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
This study examined whether spatial attention contributes to anatomical and external reference frames for tactile localization during reaching movements. Nineteen right-handed participants reached toward a target in the left or right spatial hemifield with the left or right index finger. During the reach, a tactile stimulus was delivered to the reaching hand. After reaching, participants repositioned the stimulated hand to the location where the tactile stimulus had been delivered. They then verbally reported the perceived location of the tactile stimulus on the hand. The error in the anatomical reference frame for the left hand showed a more distal deviation than that for the right hand when participants reached into the left spatial hemifield, whereas no such difference was observed when they reached into the right spatial hemifield. This finding suggests that spatial attention in the left hemisphere reduces the proximal deviation of the perceived tactile stimulus location on the right hand within the anatomical reference frame. In the external reference frame, the error for the right hand showed a distal deviation relative to the left hand when they reached toward a target in the left spatial hemifield. Conversely, the error for the left hand showed a distal deviation relative to the right hand when they reached toward a target in the right spatial hemifield. These results indicate that conflict between the anatomical and external reference frames weakens the influence of spatial attention, resulting in a distal bias in perceived tactile location in external space.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42635646What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.