ArticleInternational journal of nursing knowledge2026
Clinical validation of the nursing diagnosis of inadequate nutritional intake in children with cancer.
Article in International journal of nursing knowledge, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
PurposeTo clinically validate the nursing diagnosis "Inadequate Nutritional Intake" based on elements identified within a specific situation theory framework in the context of children with cancer.MethodThis is a diagnostic accuracy study following the Standards for Reporting Diagnostic Accuracy Studies (STARD) protocol. Specifically, it refers to the clinical validation phase of the nursing diagnosis Inadequate nutritional intake, using a cross-sectional design. The study was conducted in a tertiary pediatric hospital with a sample of 69 children diagnosed with cancer.FindingsA total of 11 clinical indicators demonstrated diagnostic accuracy above 50%, including: ascites, low weight-for-age ≤2 SD, cachexia, mid-upper arm circumference < 10th percentile, fatigue, pale mucous membranes, dry mucosa, dry skin, weight loss greater than 5% within 1 month, compromised immune response, and delayed wound healing. The primary etiological factors identified in this study were chemotherapy, economic disadvantage, inadequate dietary pattern, insufficient dietary intake, rejection of hospital food, and family food culture. The nursing diagnosis had a prevalence of 7.25% among the participating children.ConclusionsDespite the low prevalence, this study highlights that inadequate nutritional intake is a real and complex health issue in this population, with multiple etiological factors requiring a precise and systematic assessment for early identification by healthcare professionals, particularly nurses. This underscores the importance of research focused on refining nursing diagnoses in specific populations.Implications for nursing practiceValidation studies such as this enhance the accuracy and evidence-based nature of nursing practice, while also supporting collaborative decision-making for addressing nutritional issues in children with cancer, considering the various etiological factors involved.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.