Trial reportTranslational vision science & technology2026
Use of a Retinal Phantom to Facilitate Adaptive Optics Scanning Light Ophthalmoscopy Imaging in a Multicenter Clinical Trial.
Trial report in Translational vision science & technology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05537220 (NAC Attack, A Phase III, Multicenter, Randomized, Parallel, Double Masked, Placebo-Controlled Study Evaluating the Efficacy and Safety of Oral N-Acetylcysteine in Patients With Retinitis Pigmentosa), which is not on this map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
NAC Attack, A Phase III, Multicenter, Randomized, Parallel, Double Masked, Placebo-Controlled Study Evaluating the Efficacy and Safety of Oral N-Acetylcysteine in Patients With Retinitis Pigmentosa
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
31 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Purpose: To describe the use of a model eye-mounted retinal phantom to support adaptive optics scanning light ophthalmoscope (AOSLO) imaging in a multicenter clinical trial (NCT05537220). Methods: Six three-dimensional-printed retinal phantoms were mounted in model eyes. These phantoms contain equally spaced arrays of reflective "cone-like" structures mimicking foveal cone photoreceptor spacing. Intrasession repeatability of phantom imaging was assessed for all six phantoms on two custom AOSLOs. One phantom was also imaged on two additional AOSLOs to assess interdevice reproducibility. Lastly, each of the six phantoms was imaged longitudinally at their respective trial sites. Results: Intrasession repeatability of phantom-derived horizontal "cone" spacing measures was high for two different AOSLOs. However, intersystem differences were found in the average horizontal "cone" spacing of five of eight patches assessed. Across four unique AOSLOs, intersystem differences were found in the average horizontal "cone" spacing of seven of eight patches assessed. A linear regression analysis of longitudinal phantom imaging with a single AOSLO revealed few significant changes in horizontal "cone" spacing over the course of about 2 years. Similar results were observed for vertical "cone" spacing measures across the three experiments. Conclusions: Longitudinal spacing measurements were generally stable in our study. However, small but significant differences in spacing were observed between systems. The approach described here may facilitate combining cone metrics extracted from images acquired using different AOSLOs in multicenter studies. Translational Relevance: Cross-system validation strategies can support the use of AOSLO imaging in multicenter clinical trials.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.