ArticleOsteoarthritis imaging2026
Fusion of photon-counting CT and MRI improves assessment of the knee: a pilot study.
Article in Osteoarthritis imaging, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
purposeThe complementary information gained by combining photon counting CT (PCCT) and MRI may enhance the evaluation of the osteochondral unit. Our aim is to evaluate whether fusing PCCT and MRI improves diagnostic clarity and segmentation consistency for osteochondral lesions compared with MRI alone. MATERIALS AND
methods24 participants (15 with knee OA and 9 healthy controls) underwent PCCT and 3T MRI between October 2024 and May 2025. Images were co-registered and fused using a mutual information-based algorithm. Two musculoskeletal radiologists rated diagnostic clarity on 5-point Likert scales. Inter-reader agreement was quantified with the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) and Cohen kappa. Another musculoskeletal radiologist and a radiology trainee performed manual segmentations of bones, cartilage, meniscus, and osteophytes on PCCT-MRI fusion or MRI alone. Inter- and intra-rater segmentation consistency was evaluated using Dice similarity coefficient and surface Dice (sDice). Paired comparisons were analyzed with the Wilcoxon signed-rank test.
resultsFusion imaging yielded significantly higher clarity scores for cartilage thickness (3.91 vs 4.95), articular surface (3.93 vs 4.63), and osteophyte boundaries (4.00 vs 4.83; all p < .05). Inter-reader agreement improved (ICC, from 0.43 to 0.88; Cohen kappa, from 0.42 to 0.89). Quantitative analysis showed greater inter- and intra-rater consistency for cartilage (Dice, 0.70 vs 0.81; sDice, 0.66 vs 0.78) and bone (Dice, 0.93 vs 0.95; sDice, 0.61 vs 0.86; all p < .01).
conclusionPCCT-MRI fusion enhances diagnostic clarity and inter-reader agreement. Fusion also increases segmentation consistency for cartilage and bone, supporting its potential clinical value for comprehensive osteochondral evaluation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.