ArticleMetallomics : integrated biometal science2026
Preservation artifacts in zebrafish X-ray fluorescence imaging.
Article in Metallomics : integrated biometal science, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Preservation and embedding procedures can substantially influence elemental distributions measured by X-ray fluorescence imaging (XFI), particularly for mobile endogenous elements. While effects of formalin fixation have been widely studied, comparatively little is known regarding methacrylate embedding. Here, larval zebrafish (Danio rerio) exposed to methylmercury-l-cysteinate (MeHg-l-Cys) were preserved either by JB-4 methacrylate embedding or using cryosectioning/air-drying, called herein cryopreservation, then were sectioned and analyzed using quantitative XFI. Mercury distributions were largely unaffected by preservation method, whereas endogenous elements including potassium, calcium, copper, sulfur, selenium, and zinc showed varying degrees of depletion or redistribution following methacrylate embedding, with potassium showing particularly strong depletion. Despite these changes, methacrylate embedding provided improved anatomical preservation relative to cryopreservation. These results demonstrate that methacrylate embedding is suitable for studies focused primarily on mercury localization, while cryopreservation remains highly preferable when accurate preservation of endogenous elemental distributions is required.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.