Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42635389›Full record

ArticleMetallomics : integrated biometal science2026

Preservation artifacts in zebrafish X-ray fluorescence imaging.

Ashley K James, Monica Weng, Natalia V Dolgova, Kelly L Summers, Graham N George, Ingrid J Pickering

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Metallomics : integrated biometal science, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Ashley K JamesToxicology Centre, University of Saskatchewan, 44 Campus Drive, Saskatoon, Saskatchewan S7N 5B3, Canada.
Monica WengMolecular and Environmental Sciences Group, Department of Geological Sciences, University of Saskatchewan, 114 Science Place, Saskatoon, Saskatchewan S7N 5E2, Canada.
Natalia V DolgovaMolecular and Environmental Sciences Group, Department of Geological Sciences, University of Saskatchewan, 114 Science Place, Saskatoon, Saskatchewan S7N 5E2, Canada.
Kelly L SummersMolecular and Environmental Sciences Group, Department of Geological Sciences, University of Saskatchewan, 114 Science Place, Saskatoon, Saskatchewan S7N 5E2, Canada.
Graham N GeorgeToxicology Centre, University of Saskatchewan, 44 Campus Drive, Saskatoon, Saskatchewan S7N 5B3, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-0420-7493
Ingrid J PickeringToxicology Centre, University of Saskatchewan, 44 Campus Drive, Saskatoon, Saskatchewan S7N 5B3, Canada.

Funding

Canada Foundation for InnovationCanada Research Chairs CRC-2016-00092Canada Research Chairs CRC-2019-00162Canadian Light SourceJohn Evans Leader's Fund JELF-CFI-228315Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada CREATE 555378-2021Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada RGPIN-2022-04959Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada RGPIN-2025-04258New Frontiers in Research Fund NFRFE-2021-00909U.S. Department of Energy DE-AC02-06CH11357
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Preservation and embedding procedures can substantially influence elemental distributions measured by X-ray fluorescence imaging (XFI), particularly for mobile endogenous elements. While effects of formalin fixation have been widely studied, comparatively little is known regarding methacrylate embedding. Here, larval zebrafish (Danio rerio) exposed to methylmercury-l-cysteinate (MeHg-l-Cys) were preserved either by JB-4 methacrylate embedding or using cryosectioning/air-drying, called herein cryopreservation, then were sectioned and analyzed using quantitative XFI. Mercury distributions were largely unaffected by preservation method, whereas endogenous elements including potassium, calcium, copper, sulfur, selenium, and zinc showed varying degrees of depletion or redistribution following methacrylate embedding, with potassium showing particularly strong depletion. Despite these changes, methacrylate embedding provided improved anatomical preservation relative to cryopreservation. These results demonstrate that methacrylate embedding is suitable for studies focused primarily on mercury localization, while cryopreservation remains highly preferable when accurate preservation of endogenous elemental distributions is required.

Indexed as

ArtifactsCryopreservationSpectrometry, X-Ray EmissionZebrafishAnimalsMercuryMethylmercury CompoundsMercuryMethylmercury Compounds

Identifiers

PMID42635389
PMCPMC13551030

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.