ArticleBioinformatics (Oxford, England)2026
Large-scale simulation of coverage and error rate tradeoffs for cancer detection in cell-free DNA whole-genome sequencing.
Article in Bioinformatics (Oxford, England), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
motivationCell-free DNA (cfDNA) whole-genome sequencing (WGS) is a promising approach for detecting cancer recurrence. It enables cancer detection by identifying all tumor-derived cfDNA (ctDNA) molecules carrying somatic single nucleotide variants (sSNVs). While ideally, a sequencing platform should be highly accurate for reliable ctDNA detection, in reality, all sequencing platforms introduce sequencing errors that generate false positives indistinguishable from true SNVs. Understanding how sequencing parameters influence ctDNA detection sensitivity at low tumor fractions (TFs) in cfDNA samples is essential for guiding sequencing strategies in clinical contexts. To model cfDNA sequencing for tumor detection, which contains asymmetric noise and multiple interacting parameters, analytical modeling is intractable, motivating large-scale parallelized simulation.
resultsWe developed a simulation framework to generate in silico cfDNA data across 10 cancer types. In total, 480 million cfDNA samples were simulated from tumor WGS profiles. Overall, the lowest detectable TF differs substantially between cancer types under identical sequencing conditions due to variations in mutational load. For cancers with high mutational load, 3× coverage with low-error techniques reliably detects TFs below 0.1%. In contrast, cancers with low mutational load require at least six-fold higher coverage to achieve comparable detection thresholds. Increasing sequencing quality scores from Q30 to Q55 at 30× coverage further enhances sensitivity, enabling detection of TFs as low as 1 × 10-5. This study provides a comprehensive framework for optimizing sequencing parameters, offering valuable guidance for tailoring future technology development for specific cancer types and clinical applications. AVAILABILITY AND IMPLEMENTATION: The code is publicly available at https://github.com/UMCUGenetics/cfdetect/tree/main.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.