ArticleBioinformatics (Oxford, England)2026
Semi-supervised learning for automated perineural invasion detection in multi-organ H&E whole slide images.
Article in Bioinformatics (Oxford, England), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
motivationPerineural invasion (PNI) is an important pathological phenotype associated with poor prognosis in multiple malignancies. The primary detection method is visual inspection of whole slide images (WSIs), which is labor-intensive, time-consuming, subjective, and prone to high inter-observer variability. Developing reliable, accurate deep learning models for PNI detection is constrained by the lack of pixel-level annotated WSIs.
resultsWe evaluated four backbone architectures and two different approaches to improve PNI detection in a multi-organ dataset of colon, prostate, and pancreatic adenocarcinomas. We report three key findings. First, two pathology-pretrained foundation models, Virchow-2 and UNI, substantially outperformed ImageNet-pretrained CNNs (EfficientNet-B3, ConvNeXt-2), with distinct baseline error profiles reflecting differences in pretraining-data composition. Second, a data curation strategy driven by confidence-based pseudo-labelling (threshold P > .9) with human-in-the-loop review expanded the dataset from 262 to 352 WSIs, yielding a 12.4% relative F1 improvement (0.740 to 0.832) and a 55.5% reduction in false positives per slide; an ablation attributed 70% of the F1 gain to data volume and 41% of the FP reduction to benign-class curation. Third, per-organ analysis revealed that the primary driver of this improvement was not data volume alone but the targeted annotation enrichment of underrepresented morphologies in adjacent-normal and benign tissue, including desmoplastic stroma, crypts, and small blood vessels, that had been a systematic source of false positive predictions across tissue types. AVAILABILITY: Our implementation is available at https://github.com/AhmadAlkhan/PNI_SSL.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.