ArticleBioinformatics (Oxford, England)2026
Sensitivity analysis of cell fate trajectories from single-cell transcriptomics.
Article in Bioinformatics (Oxford, England), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
summaryCell differentiation is a dynamic process in which cells traverse through high-dimensional gene expression space under the influence of gene regulatory networks and environmental cues. Recent advances in single-cell RNA sequencing (scRNA-seq) have enabled us to measure high-resolution snapshots of this dynamic process. Several computational methods have been developed to reconstruct cellular flow maps from these snapshots, revealing the trajectories taken by cells in gene expression space. While existing methods provide increasingly detailed descriptions of cellular trajectories, the stability of these trajectories to perturbations is largely unexplored. As such, it remains unclear how robust inferred trajectories are to perturbations, which genes most strongly influence long-term fate outcomes, and where instability arises between competing fate commitments. While sensitivity and stability analysis tools from dynamical systems theory provide a principled way to study the stability of differentiation trajectories, existing approaches are not designed for the high-dimensionality and sparsity of scRNA-seq data. Here, we introduce FateSens, a sensitivity-based computational framework for analyzing gene regulatory dynamics using flow maps derived from scRNA-seq data. FateSens performs sensitivity analysis of differentiation trajectories derived from scRNA-seq data to identify regulatory genes and fate boundaries. To demonstrate its utility, we applied FateSens to study neutrophil-monocyte differentiation using scRNA-seq data of mouse hematopoiesis. While FateSens relies only on transcriptomic measurements, this dataset also contains lineage tracing barcodes that provide ground-truth fate relationships. Our results show that FateSens accurately recovers regulators consistent with known biology and identifies fate boundaries that are supported by lineage tracing data. AVAILABILITY AND IMPLEMENTATION: We implement FateSens in Python 3, with an open-source implementation available at: https://github.com/sashittal-group/FateSens.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.