ArticleBioinformatics (Oxford, England)2026
An end-to-end computational framework for "Record-seq" transcriptional recording data.
Article in Bioinformatics (Oxford, England), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
motivationRecord-seq captures cumulative transcriptional activity over time in engineered Escherichia coli by integrating cellular RNA-derived spacer sequences into clustered regularly interspaced short palindromic repeats (CRISPR) arrays, which are read out by sequencing. Unlike the approximately uniform transcript sampling of RNA-seq, Record-seq records biological signal as spacers sampled by the CRISPR spacer acquisition machinery. Consequently, standard RNA-seq analysis strategies are not directly applicable, limiting sensitivity and interpretability. Our previous pipeline addressed these challenges only partially, retained inherited RNA-seq assumptions, and had limited algorithmic efficiency.
resultsHere, we present an end-to-end computational framework for Record-seq data. To address the primary computational bottleneck of spacer sequence extraction, we implemented a wavefront alignment approach for efficient quasi-local pattern matching, achieving an approximately 30-fold speedup. We introduce transcription unit-based feature counting as an alternative to gene-body quantification to better represent prokaryotic transcription and increase statistical power by capturing signal from untranslated regions, which are spacer acquisition hotspots. For downstream analyses, we incorporate multiple normalization strategies and a nonparametric differential expression testing framework designed for sparse datasets. Further, we analyze spacer acquisition patterns and train sequence-based neural models that predict acquisition propensity from genomic sequence and annotations, providing a framework for assessing whether acquisition rules generalize as Record-seq is extended to new microbial hosts. AVAILABILITY AND IMPLEMENTATION: The primary analysis workflow, the recoRdseq package, acquisition modeling repository, and relevant data are all linked at https://github.com/plattlab/Record-seq-Framework. Acquisition models and training data are on Zenodo at https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.18891434.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.