ArticleBioinformatics (Oxford, England)2026
ViralQC: a tool for assessing completeness and contamination of predicted viral contigs.
Article in Bioinformatics (Oxford, England), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Expanded detection of canine enteric viruses in UK dogs with diarrhoea.Microbial genomics · 2026Article
- Mosquito viromes across England and Wales reveal hidden arbovirus signals and limited ecological structuring.Frontiers in microbiology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
motivationViruses represent the most abundant biological entities on Earth, playing vital roles in diverse ecosystems. Cataloging viruses across various environments is essential for understanding their properties and functions. Metagenomic sequencing has emerged as the most comprehensive method for virus discovery. However, distinguishing viral sequences from the vast background of microbial organisms in metagenomic data remains a significant challenge. Existing tools experience varying degrees of false positive rates due to noise in sequencing and assembly, and the integration of proviruses into microbial genomes. This highlights the urgent need for an accurate and efficient method to evaluate the quality of viral contigs.
resultsTo address these challenges, we introduce ViralQC, a tool designed to assess the quality of viral contigs or bins. ViralQC identifies microbial contamination within putative viral sequences using an ensemble framework powered by DNA and protein foundation models and estimates completeness by analyzing protein organization. We evaluated ViralQC on multiple datasets and compared its performance against the state-of-the-art tool, CheckV. Leveraging both DNA and protein foundation models, ViralQC achieves higher sensitivity on contamination detection for contigs longer than 10 kbp while maintaining comparable accuracy. Additionally, ViralQC delivers more accurate estimation on contigs with completeness > 50%. AVAILABILITY: The source code of ViralQC is available via: https://github.com/ChengPENG-wolf/ViralQC.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.