Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42635203›Full record

ArticleBioinformatics (Oxford, England)2026

Tail-aware heterogeneous graph neural networks for multi-class drug-drug interaction prediction.

Varshini Venkatesh, Varsha G, Dhannya S M

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Bioinformatics (Oxford, England), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Varshini VenkateshDepartment of Computer Science and Engineering, Sri Sivasubramaniya Nadar College of Engineering, OMR, Chennai, Tamil Nadu 603110, India.
Varsha GDepartment of Computer Science and Engineering, Sri Sivasubramaniya Nadar College of Engineering, OMR, Chennai, Tamil Nadu 603110, India.
Dhannya S MDepartment of Computer Science and Engineering, Sri Sivasubramaniya Nadar College of Engineering, OMR, Chennai, Tamil Nadu 603110, India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

motivationPolypharmacy is increasingly common in clinical practice, and the sheer number of possible drug combinations makes manual interaction screening impractical. Early computational approaches relied on chemical similarity metrics and rule-based systems, while subsequent machine learning and deep learning methods improved predictive power but continued to treat drugs as isolated entities, missing the broader biological context that governs interaction behaviour. Graph Neural Network (GNN) based methods address this by modeling drugs alongside proteins, diseases, and side effects in a shared relational graph, but tend to fall short on sparsely represented long-tail interaction classes due to the severe class imbalance that characterizes real-world biomedical interaction data.

resultsWe construct a large-scale heterogeneous biomedical knowledge graph-26 408 nodes across five entity types and 1 679 387 edges across six relation types-and benchmark MLP, GCN, HGT, and RGCN for 105- class DDI prediction. RGCN achieves the strongest overall performance (Macro F1: 0.694, Recall: 0.720), with relation-specific weight matrices proving the critical factor in heterogeneous DDI modelling. Among class imbalance strategies tested, Tail-Aware Focal Loss outperforms standard cross-entropy by 3.1% on Macro F1 and 7.4% on Recall, striking a better balance between class performance than either weighted cross-entropy or weighted random sampling.

Indexed as

Computational BiologyGraph Neural NetworksDrug InteractionsHumansMachine Learning

Identifiers

PMID42635203
PMCPMC13501307

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.