ArticleBioinformatics (Oxford, England)2026
Mitigating Goodhart's law in epitope-conditioned TCR generation using plug-and-play reward designs.
Article in Bioinformatics (Oxford, England), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
motivationEpitope-conditioned T cell receptor (TCR) generation extends protein language modeling to the design of therapeutically relevant receptors. Reinforcement learning (RL) post-training with surrogate binding predictors can improve generation controllability, but it is vulnerable to Goodhart's Law: optimizing an imperfect surrogate reward can lead to reward inflation, distributional drift, and biologically implausible or nonspecific sequences. We investigate whether reward hacking can be mitigated through improved reward formulations without modifying the generator architecture or training pipeline and without requiring additional training data.
resultsWe introduce a plug-and-play reward-design framework for RL-based TCR generation that combines heuristic biological priors, model ensembling, and binding-specificity objectives based on max-margin and contrastive formulations. These components suppress degenerate sequences, reduce model-specific biases, and discourage cross-epitope binding. During RL fine-tuning, the proposed rewards stabilize optimization, limit surrogate-reward inflation, preserve canonical CDR3β sequence patterns and repertoire diversity, and maintain closer alignment with experimentally validated TCR-binder distributions. In evaluations on unseen epitopes, the specificity-aware reward formulations provide the strongest overall performance, improving diversity and ground-truth distributional alignment while retaining biological authenticity and predicted target binding. These findings demonstrate that Goodhart-resistant reward design improves the reliability, controllability, and generalization of epitope-conditioned TCR generation. AVAILABILITY AND IMPLEMENTATION: Code and models are available in a public repository (https://github.com/Lee-CBG/TCRRobustRewardDesign).
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.