ArticleGenome biology and evolution2026
Identification and Classification of Expressed Orphan Genes, Spurious Orphan Genes, and Conserved Genes in the Human Gut Microbiome.
Article in Genome biology and evolution, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Orphan genes (OGs)-genes lacking detectable homologs outside a species-are widespread in microbial genomes and are thought to contribute to their adaptation and molecular innovation. However, not all predicted OGs may represent novel functional coding sequences. False positive OGs, also called spurious OGs, can arise from gene prediction errors. We reason that OGs lacking detectable expression are more likely to be spurious. To test this, we combined large-scale metatranscriptomic profiling of the human gut microbiome with machine learning to distinguish expressed OGs from spurious ones and compare them with conserved genes (CGs) found in multiple species. Using nearly 5,000 metatranscriptome libraries, we identified ∼218,000 OGs supported by expression evidence, while ∼330,000 predicted OGs lacked detectable expression and were classified as spurious. We extracted 154 features for sequence, structural, and evolutionary properties for each gene and trained XGBoost classifiers while accounting for genomic representation. The models achieved an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) of 0.82 in distinguishing expressed OGs from spurious OGs and an AUC of 0.93 in distinguishing expressed OGs from CGs. Interpretation based on SHAP (SHapley Additive exPlanations) revealed clear biological signals. Particularly, expressed orphans were present in more genomes than spurious ones, and expressed OGs were shorter than CGs. This work improves OG discovery and suggests that expressed OGs differ systematically from CGs and spurious OGs in sequence composition, structural constraints, and evolutionary signals.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.