ReviewAdvanced healthcare materials2026
Silicone Breast Implants as a Model System for Understanding Polymer Permeation in Soft Materials In Vivo.
Review in Advanced healthcare materials, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Silicone breast implants have long been associated with the gradual release of low molecular weight siloxanes from the inner gel through the implant membrane into the periprosthetic biological environment, a phenomenon commonly referred to as "gel bleed." Despite more than five decades of investigation spanning polymer science, transport theory, and biomedical research, the physicochemical mechanisms underlying silicone permeation remain conceptually fragmented. Here, we revisit silicone permeation by examining how molecular transport arises from the intrinsic interplay between polymer architecture, thermodynamic partitioning, and diffusional mobility within crosslinked networks. We further analyze the key determinants of permeation, including implant aging, barrier-layer technologies, and interaction with the periprosthetic tissue environment. We further discuss how dynamic bio-interfaces influence bidirectional transport and bioaccumulation in vivo. Beyond their implications for implant performance, these observations provide broader conceptual insights into mass transport in soft materials, highlighting general principles relevant to elastomers, hydrogels, and drug-delivery systems. By integrating material structure, transport physics and host interactions, this review establishes a mechanistic viewpoint on polymer permeation in vivo and offers design considerations for next-generation soft implantable biomaterials.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42635119What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.