Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42635106›Full record

ArticleRenal failure2026

Post-procedural access blood flow and repeat endovascular intervention in hemodialysis vascular access: a recurrent-event cohort study.

Hong-Mou Shih, Cheng-Jui Lin, Shih-Ming Chuang, Kuei-Shan Chang, Chih-Jen Wu, Chi-Feng Pan

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Renal failure, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Hong-Mou ShihDivision of Nephrology, Department of Internal Medicine, MacKay Memorial Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan.
Cheng-Jui LinDivision of Nephrology, Department of Internal Medicine, MacKay Memorial Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan.
Shih-Ming ChuangSchool of Medicine, College of Medicine, MacKay Medical University, Taipei, Taiwan.
Kuei-Shan ChangDivision of Nephrology, Department of Internal Medicine, MacKay Memorial Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan.
Chih-Jen WuDivision of Nephrology, Department of Internal Medicine, MacKay Memorial Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan.
Chi-Feng PanDivision of Nephrology, Department of Internal Medicine, MacKay Memorial Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The prognostic value of access blood flow (Qa) measured after endovascular intervention is uncertain. We performed an episode-based recurrent-event cohort study of maintenance hemodialysis patients undergoing endovascular intervention for arteriovenous access dysfunction. The primary exposure was post-procedural Qa modeled continuously per 100 mL/min higher Qa; post-procedural Qa <1000 mL/min was examined as a secondary clinically interpretable threshold. The outcome was time to the next access intervention, analyzed using an Andersen-Gill counting-process Cox model with patient-level cluster-robust variance. A total of 131 patients contributed 382 intervention episodes, and post-procedural Qa was available for 315 episodes. Median time to repeat intervention was shorter for Qa <1000 mL/min than for Qa ≥1000 mL/min. In the primary adjusted model, each 100 mL/min higher post-procedural Qa was associated with a lower hazard of repeat intervention (aHR 0.941, 95% CI 0.896-0.990,

Indexed as

Arteriovenous Shunt, SurgicalEndovascular ProceduresGraft Occlusion, VascularKidney Failure, ChronicRenal DialysisAgedBlood Flow VelocityCohort StudiesFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedRegional Blood FlowAccess blood flowendovascular interventionhemodialysisstenosis

Identifiers

PMID42635106
PMCPMC13508538

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.