ArticleCurrent zoology2026
SimCLR-enhanced MammalHairNet: advancing species identification through hair scale classification.
Article in Current zoology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The aim of this study is to enhance the classification accuracy of mammalian hair scale images using deep learning techniques, particularly SimCLR (Simple Framework for Contrastive Learning of Visual Representations) pretraining with unlabeled data, providing reliable technical support for species identification. We created a mammalian scanning electron microscope image dataset of 9,953 valid images of 33 mammal species. Four segmentation models-U-Net, SegNet, DeepLabV3+, and Segment Anything Model (SAM)-were evaluated for performance. SAM achieved the highest segmentation accuracy overall, although minor errors were still observed in the delineation of scales with clearly defined edges. SimCLR was pretrained on 2 datasets: one containing all 33 species, and a subset of 25 species with over 200 images per species. These models achieved Top-1 accuracies of 94.64% and 94.40%, exceeding ResNet-50, EfficientNet_b0, and ViT-B/16 trained from scratch, comparable to transfer learning (pretrained on ImageNet) results of ResNet-50 and EfficientNet_b0, and superior to that of ViT-B/16. Score-CAM visualizations revealed that the network's attention was focused on image regions that correspond to the morphological features traditionally used for species identification, demonstrating strong biological interpretability. Additionally, t-SNE visualizations confirmed the model's ability to effectively distinguish between different species. Cosine distance-based clustering of species-specific scale features further highlighted interspecies similarity patterns and commonly misclassified species pairs. The results demonstrate that deep learning models, particularly with the integration of SimCLR pretraining, are highly effective in classifying mammalian hair scales, providing a reliable method for species identification.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.