ArticleCurrent zoology2026
Reactions of roe deer to human disturbances and wolf predation in a Polish forest.
Article in Current zoology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Antipredator responses of prey are important because of their potential trophic cascade effects. Predator responses are especially important for species that impact the economy, such as ungulates. Past research has focused on the behavioral adaptation of roe deer, the most common ungulate in Europe, to human and lynx pressure. However, the European wolf population has increased in the last decade and in some recently recolonized parts of Poland roe deer constitute the largest food source for wolves. Unlike in moose and red deer, no evidence has yet been found for changes in the vigilance-foraging time ratio in roe deer in response to wolves. We took the unique opportunity to study the behavior of roe deer during the partial recolonization by wolves of a large forest complex (Tuchola Forest) in Poland. Using video cameras, we found that roe deer react differently to the presence of wolves compared with humans. Wolf predation increases roe deer movement. In comparison, anthropopressure causes roe deer to mainly use an avoidance strategy, limiting their activity to times of day when people are not present. This temporal avoidance strategy was similar whether human pressure resulted from recreation or hunting.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.