ArticleCureus2026
Microdebrider Adenoidectomy Technique.
Article in Cureus, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Adenoidectomy is a common surgery among children in the United States. Adenoid hypertrophy is associated with several disorders that impact childhood development, such as sleep disordered breathing, otologic disease, and gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD). The gold standard treatment for these disorders has been surgical excision of the adenoid tissue. Several techniques have been employed in the past, including sharp dissection with curettes, monopolar suction cautery, coblation, and microdebrider excision. Each of these techniques has advantages and disadvantages with respect to operative time, intraoperative blood loss, and postoperative complications, the most important of which are postoperative bleeding, adenoid regrowth, and velopalatal insufficiency. Here, we describe the use of a microdebrider for excision of the adenoid and explore the advantages and disadvantages of this method. The microdebrider technique is effective and safe, particularly for ENT surgeons who have significant experience using the microdebrider. This technique allows for precise tissue excision without thermal injury to surrounding structures. It also allows for full visualization of the posterior nasopharynx due to the microdebrider's built-in suction mechanism, which keeps the field clear of any tissue debris or blood that may accumulate during the excision. This experience mirrors much of the literature on this subject, which demonstrates the similar effectiveness of the microdebrider technique when compared with others and has identified a decreased risk of postoperative bleeding and adenoid regrowth.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.