Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42634746›Full record

ArticleCureus2026

First-Line Nivolumab Plus Ipilimumab in Inoperable Epithelioid Malignant Pleural Mesothelioma: Real-World Experience From an Indian Tertiary Care Center.

Avi Shah, Ankit Agarwal, Vishva Rajpuria, Shiv Ghodasara, Jagdish Swami, Vibhav Kanth, Hiren Dangar, Ashish Jakhetiya

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cureus, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Avi ShahMedical Oncology, Geetanjali Medical College, Udaipur, IND.
Ankit AgarwalMedical Oncology, Geetanjali Medical College, Udaipur, IND.
Vishva RajpuriaGeneral Medicine, Smt. Nathiba Hargovandas Lakhmichand (NHL) Municipal Medical College, Ahmedabad, IND.
Shiv GhodasaraMedical Oncology, Geetanjali Medical College, Udaipur, IND.
Jagdish SwamiMedical Oncology, Geetanjali Medical College, Udaipur, IND.
Vibhav KanthMedical Oncology, Geetanjali Medical College, Udaipur, IND.
Hiren DangarMedical Oncology, Geetanjali Medical College, Udaipur, IND.
Ashish JakhetiyaSurgical Oncology, Geetanjali Medical College, Udaipur, IND.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background Malignant pleural mesothelioma (MPM) is a highly aggressive, rare malignancy with poor prognosis. Standard frontline treatments have traditionally relied on platinum-based chemotherapy doublets, which offer limited long-term survival benefit. This study evaluates the efficacy, clinical-demographic profile, and safety of first-line dual checkpoint inhibition using nivolumab and ipilimumab in patients with inoperable MPM within an Indian tertiary care setting. Materials and methods A retrospective study was conducted from January 2021 to August 2023 at a single tertiary care center in India. Fifteen patients aged ≥ 18 years with histologically confirmed, previously untreated, metastatic/inoperable epithelioid MPM and an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status (PS) of 0-2 were included. Patients received nivolumab (240 mg intravenously every two weeks) combined with ipilimumab (1 mg/kg intravenously every six weeks) until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. Response assessments were performed using positron emission tomography (PET) scans at three months using modified RECIST criteria. The primary objective of this study was to evaluate the real-world overall survival (OS), including median OS and one-year OS and safety profile. Secondary objectives included the assessment of objective response rate (ORR) at first reassessment using modified RECIST criteria and the characterization of the clinical-demographic landscape of this population and toxicity profile. Results The cohort consisted of 15 patients (median age: 65 years, range: 40-76), comprising eight males (54%) and seven females (46%). The median number of administered treatment cycles was seven for nivolumab (range: 2-26) and three for ipilimumab (range: 1-10). At the three-month evaluation, nine patients (60%) achieved a partial response, maintaining a stable response through the 12-month follow-up. Six patients (40%) experienced disease progression after the initial assessment, experiencing an OS of less than nine months. At the 12-month endpoint, the one-year OS rate was 60%, with nine patients alive and continuing immunotherapy. Treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs) occurred in 12 patients (80%), with Grade 3 or 4 TRAEs reported in four patients (26%). The most common all-grade TRAEs were diarrhea (26%), hypothyroidism/thyroiditis (20%), and rash (13%). Grade 3/4 toxicities included hepatitis (6%) and severe diarrhea (13%). Conclusion First-line treatment with combined nivolumab and ipilimumab demonstrates promising clinical efficacy, durable responses, and a manageable safety profile in Indian patients presenting with inoperable epithelioid MPM. These real-world outcomes align closely with global clinical trial benchmarks, supporting a chemotherapy-free dual-immunotherapy strategy. Larger prospective randomized trials are needed to validate these findings within the regional population.

Indexed as

dual immune checkpoint inhibitorsmalignant pleural mesothelioma (mpm)real world datasafety and efficacyunresectable pleural mesothelioma

Identifiers

PMID42634746
PMCPMC13500058

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.