Trial reportDrug design, development and therapy2026
Transversus Abdominis Plane Block with Liposomal Bupivacaine versus Ropivacaine for Postoperative Cesarean Analgesia: A Randomized Controlled Trial.
Trial report in Drug design, development and therapy, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Effective postoperative analgesia is critical for enhanced recovery after cesarean delivery (CD). Chinese liposomal bupivacaine (LB), a multivesicular long-acting local anesthetic, may provide prolonged analgesia when used in transversus abdominis plane (TAP) blocks, but data in CD remain limited. Methods: This prospective randomized controlled trial, conducted at a single center and utilizing a design with blinded outcome assessment, involved patients who were scheduled to undergo elective CD under spinal anesthesia. Participants were randomly assigned in a 1:1 fashion to either receive bilateral TAP blocks with LB 266 mg or with ropivacaine (RP) 150 mg. All individuals in the study were given standardized multimodal analgesia that included patient-controlled intravenous analgesia based on sufentanil. The main outcome measured was the pain scores assessed using a visual analog scale (VAS) at rest and movement at 24 hours following surgery. Secondary outcomes encompassed the VAS at rest and movement at 48 and 72 hours, the consumption of opioids, activations of PCIA, usage of rescue analgesics, functional recovery, duration of hospital stay, levels of patient satisfaction, and any adverse events (AEs) that occurred. Results: A total of 82 patients participated in the study. There was no significant between-group difference in movement VAS scores at 24 hours. However, movement VAS scores were significantly lower in the LB group at 48 and 72 hours ( Conclusion: In this randomized controlled trial, LB did not significantly reduce pain scores at the predefined 24-hour primary endpoint compared with RP. Lower movement pain scores at 48 and 72 hours and a modest reduction in postoperative opioids consumption were observed as secondary findings. Trial Registration: ChiCTR2400088013.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.