ArticleNeurotrauma reports
Cervical Spine Pathology in the Context of Intimate Partner and Interpersonal Violence: A Case Series and Focused Narrative Review.
Article in Neurotrauma reports. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Intimate partner violence (IPV), interpersonal violence, and caregiver abuse are common, frequently under-disclosed contexts for neurotrauma and delayed injury recognition. Relative to traumatic brain injury and hypoxic/anoxic injury after nonfatal strangulation, IPV-associated spinal injury is less well characterized, and existing spine literature has largely emphasized thoracolumbar compression-type fractures rather than cervical spine injuries. We present three neurosurgical cases of cervical spine pathology with cord or nerve root compromise occurring in the context of disclosed IPV or suspected interpersonal violence/caregiver abuse, representing acute, subacute, and chronic presentations Imaging phenotypes included C5-C6 left paracentral/foraminal disc herniation with canal/foraminal compromise, multilevel cervical stenosis with cord compression and myelomalacia, and a destructive C6-C7 disc-space process with cord compression followed by instrumentation failure after recurrent trauma. The cases illustrate delayed or partial disclosure, dependence on caregivers or partners, incomplete neurological documentation, psychosocial vulnerability, and missed opportunities for safety intervention when disclosure is not elicited in a private and trusted setting. All three patients disclosed nonfatal strangulation or assault-related neck trauma, highlighting the relevance of strangulation screening and selective vascular, brain, and cervical spine imaging in neurotrauma and spine settings. We synthesize literature on IPV-related neurotrauma, spinal injury patterns, disclosure, strangulation evaluation, and emerging blood-based biomarkers, and propose a pragmatic "neurosurgical touchpoint" pathway for privacy-enabled screening, objective documentation, safe provision of supports, selective imaging, and warm referral to social work/IPV advocacy resources. Neurosurgical encounters may therefore represent critical opportunities to identify risk, support safe disclosure, and reduce missed opportunities for intervention.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.